Quote:
"Purple Cameo" is "Peach." But that chick looks darker than what I've seen here of those mutations. I'm guessing these were not labeled very well, or perhaps it meant "Cameo X Purple."
Really it has not been proven, a few think that maybe the case. chick doesn't look to be peach, its looks purple, the lighting could be off.
My guess the egg label is what both parents are.
It's also never been proven to be a single mutation.
If Clifton told me the truth about his offspring from his trio, then it's not genetically possible that Peach is a separate, unique mutation. A few other people PM'ed me back during the combining colors thread and have set up test-matings among their peafowl. I told them what they'd get if Peach is one mutation, versus what they'd get if it was a combination of two. But the information presented out there regarding the history of Peach is not consistent with the model of it being a single mutation. And I get agreement from the man who bred the first one.
If you want to try your hand at making your own Peach, it will take two generations. Make a male that is split to both Purple and Cameo, and keep breeding from him (to anything OTHER than Peach, to confirm that I'm right). Eventually, you'll find a female Peach chick. My guess is that the odds are about 3 in 200, if the 3% chance of crossover at any given locus probability is accurate for peafowl (3%, divided in half, so as to get a female).
Perhaps no one wants to admit it's possible or investigate it further because it would mean that people could make their own Peach -- instead of spending money on a relatively new "single mutation."
ETA
To avoid hijacking this thread any further (my apologies to the OP), I will began a new thread.
"Purple Cameo" is "Peach." But that chick looks darker than what I've seen here of those mutations. I'm guessing these were not labeled very well, or perhaps it meant "Cameo X Purple."
Really it has not been proven, a few think that maybe the case. chick doesn't look to be peach, its looks purple, the lighting could be off.
My guess the egg label is what both parents are.
It's also never been proven to be a single mutation.
If Clifton told me the truth about his offspring from his trio, then it's not genetically possible that Peach is a separate, unique mutation. A few other people PM'ed me back during the combining colors thread and have set up test-matings among their peafowl. I told them what they'd get if Peach is one mutation, versus what they'd get if it was a combination of two. But the information presented out there regarding the history of Peach is not consistent with the model of it being a single mutation. And I get agreement from the man who bred the first one.
If you want to try your hand at making your own Peach, it will take two generations. Make a male that is split to both Purple and Cameo, and keep breeding from him (to anything OTHER than Peach, to confirm that I'm right). Eventually, you'll find a female Peach chick. My guess is that the odds are about 3 in 200, if the 3% chance of crossover at any given locus probability is accurate for peafowl (3%, divided in half, so as to get a female).
Perhaps no one wants to admit it's possible or investigate it further because it would mean that people could make their own Peach -- instead of spending money on a relatively new "single mutation."

ETA
To avoid hijacking this thread any further (my apologies to the OP), I will began a new thread.

Last edited: