I have been lurking on this thread for quite a while soaking up all I possibly can, just like everyone else.I grew up in rural Oklahoma around A LOT of people that kept good-sized flocks, but since my great great grandmother, our family has not had them. My mom was also of the generation that seemed to be slightly resentful of rural life, though she's thawing out in her old age
.
Though until Spring I won't have any personal experience with chickens, I was particularly interested in the spirited discussion about genetics and breeding for characteristics, quality of breeders, etc. Part of the interest is that I have been beating my head on a wall trying to find local poultry. I figured if I could I might forego the idea I had about buying from Meyer hatchery. That conversation got me thinking...I realize these observations are a day late and dollar short, but I wondered if I couldn't offer a slightly scientific standpoint and flex my philosophical/academic muscles for a second.
It seems to me, in the limited dealings I've had with genetics, that what hatcheries breed out, you should be able to selectively breed back in to higher quality birds. Though it would certainly take a few generations and culling sessions, I don't see any reason why someone (like Bee, especially) couldn't wind up with outstanding stock from humble beginnings. Thinking of the genetics as a puzzle that major sellers remove pieces from, by selectively breeding and culling for missing traits, I don't see why you couldn't end up with something just as close to breed standard as some direct line descendants. Granted, you would have to be very diligent, I think it's possible to achieve wonderful quality from "big box store" type hatcheries. I like to think that prime traits for each breed are scattered throughout all those hatchery chicks, just waiting to be put back together, like the hatchery left the "puzzle frame" and scattered the pieces around.
Okie dokie. Done waxing philosophical. Carry on!