Quote:
There is no dilemma what so ever here.
If you consort with him in the manner you describe, what your doing is illegal.
Under section 1 of the Sherman anti trust act Price Fixing can be prosecuted at a FELONY.
"Price fixing requires a conspiracy between two or more sellers; the purpose is to coordinate pricing for mutual benefit at the expense of buyers. Sellers might agree to sell at a common target price; set a common "minimum" price; buy the product from a supplier at a specified "maximum" price; adhere to a price book or list price; engage in cooperative price advertising; standardize financial credit terms offered to purchasers; use uniform trade-in allowances; limit discounts; discontinue a free service or fix the price of one component of an overall service; adhere uniformly to previously-announced prices and terms of sale; establish uniform costs and markups; impose mandatory surcharges; purposefully reduce output or sales in order to charge higher prices; or purposefully share or "pool" markets, territories, or customers."
So you have nothing what so ever to discuss with him.
Jamie
Glad I caught your post, as I was reading I was getting ready to tell the OP that the caller broke the law. He is lucky the OP did not report him.
The neighbor did not break the law. Let's not turn this into something it isn't. The neighbor picked up the phone to discuss pricing. That is not against the law. Even if the neighbor and the poster decided to charge the same price, it would not fall under anti-trust legislation. The legislation applies to a group of companies that control the market. So, for example, if Chrysler, GM and Ford got together to fix prices, that would be prosecutable, as that group controls the domestic car market. If two sellers decide to charge a certain price, they can do that as long as consumers have other choices. In other words, as long as consumers can buy their chicken elsewhere, the situation does not fall under anti-trust.