Well...I guess I call it a gene mutation and they call it a retrovirus? A gene mutation can be either and deletion or insertion to DNA or RNA genome. It sounds like they are saying that the blue egg mutation that occurred several hundred years ago and then selectively breed for was the result a mutation in the form of an insertion to the RNA genome.
A retrovirus is a family of single strand parasites that insert their own genetic code into the RNA of a host cell (rather than the DNA like what we call a virus). This insertion of the the RNA obligates the host cell to reproduce the parasite rather than build new cells to sustain itself. If the blue egg were caused by a parasite, then the parasite would infect the host and once the host was destroyed it would have to move to new hosts. I can see the logic in theory that a retrovirus introduced a mutation into a chicken 300 years ago and after the host destroyed the retrovirus the damage to the RNA was not repaired changing the protein that was produced to something that cast the blue hue to the shell. I can not see the logic in a retrovirus living in lines of blue egg laying chickens for 300 years and breeders selectively breeding for birds that have the retrovirus, those that don't have the retrovirus, those that are split for the retrovirus, etc. That is not how it works. Retrovirus don't just target the part of the cells from dad who was the an Easter Egger, but no the part of the cells from mom that what laid white eggs. They attack any cell they are in their range of and destroy the host if the host can't destroy it first. They also don't create an occasional blue egg. A hen that lays a blue egg will lay every egg blue her whole life. Not nine brown eggs and then a blue egg followed by another nine brown egg. Saying that your Americana, Cream Legbar, or Auracana have a retrovirus sounds like science fiction at its best to me.
Just my thoughts and anyone who has read the Legbar Thread knows that my options don't always turn out to be right.
A retrovirus is a family of single strand parasites that insert their own genetic code into the RNA of a host cell (rather than the DNA like what we call a virus). This insertion of the the RNA obligates the host cell to reproduce the parasite rather than build new cells to sustain itself. If the blue egg were caused by a parasite, then the parasite would infect the host and once the host was destroyed it would have to move to new hosts. I can see the logic in theory that a retrovirus introduced a mutation into a chicken 300 years ago and after the host destroyed the retrovirus the damage to the RNA was not repaired changing the protein that was produced to something that cast the blue hue to the shell. I can not see the logic in a retrovirus living in lines of blue egg laying chickens for 300 years and breeders selectively breeding for birds that have the retrovirus, those that don't have the retrovirus, those that are split for the retrovirus, etc. That is not how it works. Retrovirus don't just target the part of the cells from dad who was the an Easter Egger, but no the part of the cells from mom that what laid white eggs. They attack any cell they are in their range of and destroy the host if the host can't destroy it first. They also don't create an occasional blue egg. A hen that lays a blue egg will lay every egg blue her whole life. Not nine brown eggs and then a blue egg followed by another nine brown egg. Saying that your Americana, Cream Legbar, or Auracana have a retrovirus sounds like science fiction at its best to me.
Just my thoughts and anyone who has read the Legbar Thread knows that my options don't always turn out to be right.

Last edited: