I think what we've got here is a vocabulary issue. (I could be wrong, but this will be useful anyway as it will discuss various options for people hoping to improve their "back yards," either for chicken pleasures or for gardening, etc., most of which most of you probably already know, but it is easier to communicate if we're all using the same nouns and verbs in the same way)
If I'm understanding Beekissed right, what it sounds like the author in question had delivered in vast quantities was this stuff ...
http://www.homedepot.com/p/Miracle-...t-Garden-Soil-72859650/100665135#.Ut1OYCitsy4
not this stuff ...
http://www.wikihow.com/Find-Inexpensive-Mulch
(for those of you not wanting to follow the links, the top one is a link to a bag of organic
top soil on Home Depot's website @ $7.47 for 1.5 cu. ft.), and the second link is a wikihow article on how to find "inexpensive" garden
mulch).
We run a landscape business, and if you're buying top soil in bulk, it is sold by the "yard," and here it costs approximately $25/yd (and then of course we get to charge for delivery and distribution, too). BUT ... if you want special soils for potting or amending they are between $30 and $40 per yard ... and if you want "Certified Organic," I'm not sure what the options are ...
Another way to get to the super rich top soil Beekissed was describing she observed in the photo in question ... if it isn't native to the property and one does not wish to spend the years of time building it "naturally," ... is to amend the soil (either existing or trucked in) with a lot of
compost. We do this a lot when landscaping, usually in combination with bringing in top soil (this is especially a good idea in new construction where often any existing top soil was "disturbed" beyond usefulness by the various builders involved and everyone wants immediate results) ... install good top soil, then add a nice thick layer of compost, and then put the landscaping on top of that. When I called around looking for "Certified Organic" compost in the area I did find a source, and if I remember correctly it was competitively priced, but I don't remember off the top of my head what the price was.
Sometimes we add layers of drainage stuff under the soil ... that's a whole extra discussion, I think.
How much a "yard" (that's American yard, or 324 sq ft) of soil or mulch will cover depends entirely on how deep you want to spread it. If you want a good 3", you'll get 10 sq ft of coverage out of your yard of soil.
This, of course, is ALL directly applicable to the notion of improving garden/pasture conditions for the birds. If a person has a "spent" area where the chickens have been for a while so have it looking like the surface of the moon, then it is possible to bring the area back with time & rest & pampering, or the "fast" way with the importation of lovely rich
top soils and garden
composts.
A good way to protect the soil, I think, is to cover it with
mulch that can help retain moisture, retain soil, slow down weeds, and give the kids several inches of something to scratch around in besides the actual soil.
Top soil, compost, mulch.
:/ IMO that's a ridiculous price for soil... It might pass if it were 1.5 cubic yards, but in feet would barely make a good mole hill. And if that's indeed what Bee was talking about, then I totally agree.
Yep. What I saw in those pics was not chipped trees...it was dark, rich, composted material and I can't imagine anyone giving that away for free....if they are, they are missing a way to make some money and I don't imagine, even in the city, that folks are giving away money.
[quote url="[URL]https://freemulch.abouttrees.com/#%21/home[/URL]"]
You may have miss the part about how the mulch acquired is usually free, as it is a byproduct trimming companies usually pay to send to a landfill. There's even a website for it.
https://freemulch.abouttrees.com/#!/home They're just chipped tree branches. Not finely composted materials, yet.
1,400 eggs is about 5 hens laying 265 eggs a year, which is less than some leghorns on light....with 10 sqf per hen = 50 square feet... She does not mention the money required for feeding them, but any of FF, fodder, worms, black soldier fly larvae, or mealworms will suffice.
50lbs wheat requires about 250 square feet.
A dwarf apple tree provides 3 to 6 bushels of fruit, one bushel being 42 pounds, taking up about a 10ft radius(314sqf).
Say two almond trees(40sqf per tree)...18 feet radius, 453 sqf total...
A nice pig pen... 16x16, 256sqf.... looks a bit of an overkill for 280lbs, but it seems pigs dislike being alone, so I made it space for 2....totaling that meat amount at, conservatively, 500lbs.
Upon first look, you would need a great garden for 2,000lbs of vegetables. But taking a random crop that first comes to mind, tomatoes... the average yield according to ISU, 16,000 per acre, or 2,000 pounds for 1/8th of it... That's 5,445 sqf.
50+250+314+453+256+5,445=6,768 10,890=1/4acre. That's 4,122square feet left over for house, lawn, and feed crop. I'll admit, there's nothing like real experience, but everything adds up.
Again....THEORY. It works out grand on paper and as a supposed scenario....show me someone who is actually doing this. And to say that this quarter acre is producing all this food is a misnomer as a lot of that "food" has be fed from outside sources, such as the hogs, chickens and even the vegetables....I don't know of any soil that is currently producing 2,000 lbs of tomatoes per quarter acre unless it's a commercial farm that is irrigated, fertilized and worked by immigrant labor. If that. I'd still be skeptical if they are producing 2000 lbs of tomatoes on that amount of land. Maybe in California? Not around here, surely...I've visited the commercial tomato farms around here and it just ain't happenin'.
A dwarf apple tree COULD produce that much fruit...theoretically...and in some areas of the country...on any given year, but most likely not consistently as fruit trees produce in cycles. Two almond trees throw off a goodly amount of shade when mature...can't garden those spaces so those must be shadowing pens?
Maybe in California these things are happening? I've yet to read anywhere that this is in actuality happening for anyone...but would be willing to read about it if you could point me to the article.
Homesteading is about self-sustainable living....there is no such thing as self-sustainable on just a quarter acre...it's impossible. Even for one person, to produce all they would eat for a whole year would be hard pressed to provide it~and I doubt they would want to eat all tomatoes, wheat, eggs, and pork for a full year.. And they would have to be in the right climate for it...maybe a tropical place, which isn't the best place to grow wheat.
You see..I've homesteaded. I've actually been in on growing enough food to feed a family of 5-9 people for an entire year....it takes way more than a quarter acre to achieve it~even for one person~ and it takes more variety of foods to do it well. Oh, a person could live off of apples, almonds, wheat, pork, tomatoes and eggs and survive...but it's not exactly a diet that anyone would want to subsist on.
It's a lovely idea and I love reading about the possibilities as much as the next person and far be it from me to rain on the possibilities parade...I'm a dreamer and love the possibilities. I love thinking outside the box about most things....but what this lady is proposing is just nigh impossible when put into practice. I apologize and will eat humble crow if anyone can show me anyone who is actually putting this theory into practice and getting consistent, accurate results as outlined by this theory.....but I'd have to see that one to believe it.
That dog won't hunt.
[/quote]
I'm rather skeptical as well when it comes to commercial farm numbers as well. People manage to get much higher yields on land that is not eroded, containing petroleum fertilizers, and killed of much beneficial life by pesticides. Like I said, you will find differences by variety, climate, and method. Mittleider, no-till, aquaponics, permaculture, square foot and conventional gardening all have their points and environments where they work or don't. I won't even mention double-dug gardens as turning the pre-existing layer of topsoil, worms, and microbes, underground simply doesn't make sense. Many people claim high yields with all these, as well with weeding techniques, fertilizer recipes, watering methods, and more. Even though those figures were from commercial farm sources, smaller farmers who do claim those high crop numbers do have the time to experiment and perfect techniques. Ones that would otherwise be completely uneconomical for large farms, as that would require a revamp of the whole industry.
Well, I did calculate an 18foot radius around the tree, both for root and limb growth, but there are many shade crops that can do well there too. It's all about making the most economical use of space without wasting anything.
I totally agree with that, and one number or formula simply doesn't work for all areas. I'm just saying, even if you did pay for fertilizers or like the article, soil, it wouldn't take vary much to grow food. Not the amount of self-sufficiency though. That would require so many facets, gardening only providing one small side of it. Furthermore, Carleen's book was only an example, as she also has plans for 1/2 acre, and 1 acre homestead plots. Not to long ago I saw there was an infographic that said 2 acres would be sufficient for 4 people or so. Many other sources claim you can have homesteads on such small areas. Apparently the problem is homesteading doesn't always equal self-sufficiency anymore. More of just a farm, where you do the most you can with your land, but not to the degree where you never have to see a grocery store again. I recall seeing several examples of this, 400 people on island off the coast of Canada, people in Alaska, Colorado mountains, another man in South America(sorry for the general area, but I don't remember the exact country.) Either way, such is practically impossible to do in most areas in America, due to everything from the high population count, to taxes. Nevertheless, I'm sure there are some fairly good crow recipes online... They seem tough to shoot though. Why go through all the trouble?