- Apr 15, 2014
- 50
- 5
- 86
i read somewhere that if you cross two breeds of very different types, the offspring will always take the body shape from the breed of the hen. Is there any truth to this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure what Roos have to do with this, I've never bred a kangaroo to a chicken!! Remember this is a forum geared towards exhibition, genetics and breeding to the standard, proper terminology is requested in the header to this forum. Cock, hen, cockerel and pullet have worked well for the last couple of millennia and I figure why change a good thing. My cockerels and cocks would refuse to breed a hen or pullet if I openly referred to them as roos.
I don't think "roo" is a southern colloquialism. I have heard cock used many times, and never heard anyone in the south use the term "roo" in reference to a male chicken.
Quote: It is not a "holier than though" attitude. Just commenting that there are rules to this forum and some here have decided to deviate from them. If you can't take the heat, move to another less restrictive forum. I too have lived in the south all my life and never heard rooster being reduced to roo; my great grandparents, grandparents, parents and I have never used this term and we have raised birds for a century and a half. South Carolina Game Roos just doesn't have the same ring to it does it? Read the header at the top of this forum when next you log in, this should clarify things that I should not have to clarify. I will stand by my lesson of truth and hold to the English language as it should be used.
Respectfully,
Bo