- Mar 21, 2009
- 2,229
- 49
- 219
I already posted this on another thread last week, but I think the whole thing is a little ridiculous. I don't like to see "Easter Eggers" referred to as "mutts" as if they are somehow lesser than Araucanas or Ameraucanas. The absolute *fact* is that nearly all chickens are "mutts" if you go by the definition of having other breeds in their background. Even some of the expensive newer varieties would be considered "mutts".
The other main issue (as I see it) is that most hatcheries in the US have been around for decades and have sold these birds for longer than the terms "Ameraucana" and certainly "Easter Egger" have been around. I don't think we can necessarily force them to change what they call them simply because the national poultry organization (and breed clubs) decide to separate the birds into three breeds. It is not like breeding to the standard is law.
My opinion is that people take their issue with the separation of the three birds to an extreme. I don't think very many even somewhat serious breeders are mislabeling their birds (and even if they were it is not like the price difference is going make them millionaires, LOL). It is usually the hatcheries and backyard hobbyists that are using the wrong names. Is it really that big of a deal? How many really buy anything other than pet/production quality birds from these sources anyway?
If you know enough to know about the three different breeds, you know enough to not buy from these sources expecting anything other than mediocre quality and birds only loosely bred to the standard, if at all.
The other main issue (as I see it) is that most hatcheries in the US have been around for decades and have sold these birds for longer than the terms "Ameraucana" and certainly "Easter Egger" have been around. I don't think we can necessarily force them to change what they call them simply because the national poultry organization (and breed clubs) decide to separate the birds into three breeds. It is not like breeding to the standard is law.
My opinion is that people take their issue with the separation of the three birds to an extreme. I don't think very many even somewhat serious breeders are mislabeling their birds (and even if they were it is not like the price difference is going make them millionaires, LOL). It is usually the hatcheries and backyard hobbyists that are using the wrong names. Is it really that big of a deal? How many really buy anything other than pet/production quality birds from these sources anyway?
If you know enough to know about the three different breeds, you know enough to not buy from these sources expecting anything other than mediocre quality and birds only loosely bred to the standard, if at all.