It would be difficult to debate that gut health affects the overall health of the animal to include people. A lot starts in the gut. There is more nerve receptors in the gut, than anywhere else in the body. You could say that the stomach is a second brain. More information is sent from the gut to the brain than from brain to the gut. Before that is misunderstood, the brain does not micromanage.
How to best encourage good gut health is more debatable. There are a lot of good ideas here. My position would be that there is a balanced approach, and not try to do too much. The system works without our intervention if the micro flora is present in their environment, and that their conditions have not become unhealthy.
There is a lot to be said for "naturally" reared chicks. That is by broody hens. However, it is helpful to understand that it is not without it's pitfalls and limitations. It would also be unhelpful to imply that artificially reared chicks cannot be as vigorous and healthy.
Karen, I agree that appropriately sized grit should be available to growing and adult birds. I think that most would agree. It is a pretty simple concept that has been understood for a long time. Other animals like crocodilians and some species of lizards benefit from grit as well.
I am not especially comfortable with the notion that corn is bad on it's own. It is true that corn is not what it was, but an argument could be made that it has been improved for our needs. In the diet of poultry, it supplies energy, and no grain is better at supplying it. Certainly it would not be healthy on it's own, but as part of a balanced ration, it does no harm. As a vegetable on my table, I see it as a treat, and little more.
I believe the key here, is to put it in perspective, and not expect too much from it. Also not to blame too much on it. In the diet of poultry, there is a role for it if it is part of a balanced ration. The alternatives have shortcomings and pitfalls of their own. There is not anything that does not.
When we took jungle fowl from the jungle, and expected more from them, we changed their dietary needs. As it stands now, there are no perfect food items. There is a lot of poultry to be fed in this world. What would we suggest as a better alternative?
I would not debate that too much corn in various forms in our own diet could be harmful. We certainly consume a lot in one form or another. I do think that it has become a convenient villain though. It is certainly a dominant player. Let us not overlook the good it has done, and take a balanced approach. It isn't as if it is poisonous or toxic.
Please do not take this as an attempt to discredit your position. I only want to add my perspective.
How to best encourage good gut health is more debatable. There are a lot of good ideas here. My position would be that there is a balanced approach, and not try to do too much. The system works without our intervention if the micro flora is present in their environment, and that their conditions have not become unhealthy.
There is a lot to be said for "naturally" reared chicks. That is by broody hens. However, it is helpful to understand that it is not without it's pitfalls and limitations. It would also be unhelpful to imply that artificially reared chicks cannot be as vigorous and healthy.
Karen, I agree that appropriately sized grit should be available to growing and adult birds. I think that most would agree. It is a pretty simple concept that has been understood for a long time. Other animals like crocodilians and some species of lizards benefit from grit as well.
I am not especially comfortable with the notion that corn is bad on it's own. It is true that corn is not what it was, but an argument could be made that it has been improved for our needs. In the diet of poultry, it supplies energy, and no grain is better at supplying it. Certainly it would not be healthy on it's own, but as part of a balanced ration, it does no harm. As a vegetable on my table, I see it as a treat, and little more.
I believe the key here, is to put it in perspective, and not expect too much from it. Also not to blame too much on it. In the diet of poultry, there is a role for it if it is part of a balanced ration. The alternatives have shortcomings and pitfalls of their own. There is not anything that does not.
When we took jungle fowl from the jungle, and expected more from them, we changed their dietary needs. As it stands now, there are no perfect food items. There is a lot of poultry to be fed in this world. What would we suggest as a better alternative?
I would not debate that too much corn in various forms in our own diet could be harmful. We certainly consume a lot in one form or another. I do think that it has become a convenient villain though. It is certainly a dominant player. Let us not overlook the good it has done, and take a balanced approach. It isn't as if it is poisonous or toxic.
Please do not take this as an attempt to discredit your position. I only want to add my perspective.