Quote:
There may be confusion in the area of "peak season"...to me, that is the months of Feb-June/July. That's when all the birds who are layers are laying at full capacity. After that one gets broodies near the end of July, some can start molting in August, etc. I'm not saying those WRs laid 6-7 eggs per week for most of the year, because they didn't. They would, however, still lay up to 4 a wk in the winter months while in their prime and after molt. I guess it's all relative to what a person considers peak. To me, acceptable slow downs for broody patterns, molting and weather changes apply as they would for any bird that wasn't considered a production breed.
Now, I'm just spitballing here and don't know anything for a fact, but I'm thinking that I've read a lot down through the years that nearly all farmers have tried to improve their particular livestock by borrowing traits from another breed with similar looks. If not, they are just playing the same game with the same genes and never improving on them except in mere increments. Maybe some will talk about that and some will not, thinking they will get criticized by the purists in the breed.
I know the commercial side and the purist, breeder side are two sides of the coin, but I don't think the original goals of improving a breed by borrowing some genetics from another breed is an overall bad thing. It's not black and white and never the twain shall meet. My hatchery WRs were not too far off the mark of the true breed, from where I am sitting, as I have breeder quality WR on the land right now and standing next to the "commercialized" version. There are subtle differences but not many, and, actually, I'd like to see the feathering on the store bought girl slide on over to the homespun one.
The laying prowess of these hatchery WRs were what caused me to fall in love with the breed in the first place. Without that, they are much like any other so-called dual purpose bird out there...heavy on the meat but not so much on the laying. If they were just heavy breed birds with mediocre laying abilities, I'd not keep them around long. What would be the purpose of even having a dual purpose bird...one could just have some leghorns and some broilers and be done with it.
I think we will get what we settle for in the end. I don't intend to give up on raising laying numbers in a WR that looks like a WR should. Nor will I sacrifice the other traits I like about this breed...these too must be part of the picture. If not, then I would be raising a breed that I'm not particularly impressed with and I can't see myself working hard on anything like that.
If that means I tilt at windmills, well, then, bring 'em on! Life just isn't worth living if one is living it without faith and a dream.
There may be confusion in the area of "peak season"...to me, that is the months of Feb-June/July. That's when all the birds who are layers are laying at full capacity. After that one gets broodies near the end of July, some can start molting in August, etc. I'm not saying those WRs laid 6-7 eggs per week for most of the year, because they didn't. They would, however, still lay up to 4 a wk in the winter months while in their prime and after molt. I guess it's all relative to what a person considers peak. To me, acceptable slow downs for broody patterns, molting and weather changes apply as they would for any bird that wasn't considered a production breed.
Now, I'm just spitballing here and don't know anything for a fact, but I'm thinking that I've read a lot down through the years that nearly all farmers have tried to improve their particular livestock by borrowing traits from another breed with similar looks. If not, they are just playing the same game with the same genes and never improving on them except in mere increments. Maybe some will talk about that and some will not, thinking they will get criticized by the purists in the breed.
I know the commercial side and the purist, breeder side are two sides of the coin, but I don't think the original goals of improving a breed by borrowing some genetics from another breed is an overall bad thing. It's not black and white and never the twain shall meet. My hatchery WRs were not too far off the mark of the true breed, from where I am sitting, as I have breeder quality WR on the land right now and standing next to the "commercialized" version. There are subtle differences but not many, and, actually, I'd like to see the feathering on the store bought girl slide on over to the homespun one.
The laying prowess of these hatchery WRs were what caused me to fall in love with the breed in the first place. Without that, they are much like any other so-called dual purpose bird out there...heavy on the meat but not so much on the laying. If they were just heavy breed birds with mediocre laying abilities, I'd not keep them around long. What would be the purpose of even having a dual purpose bird...one could just have some leghorns and some broilers and be done with it.
I think we will get what we settle for in the end. I don't intend to give up on raising laying numbers in a WR that looks like a WR should. Nor will I sacrifice the other traits I like about this breed...these too must be part of the picture. If not, then I would be raising a breed that I'm not particularly impressed with and I can't see myself working hard on anything like that.
If that means I tilt at windmills, well, then, bring 'em on! Life just isn't worth living if one is living it without faith and a dream.
Last edited: