Feed Tests - More Results

Pics
I wonder if we can agree to disagree without the laughing emoticons, passive agressive innuendo and indirect name-calling?
Those who gave money from their own pocket and lots of very polite good will were called names I would be horrified to have associated to me in any context.

Therefore if someone tried to show them support and solidarity by non-offensive, not specifically directed, generalizations, in an attempt to put salve on the wound, I am ok with that.
 
I wonder if we can agree to disagree without the laughing emoticons, passive agressive innuendo and indirect name-calling?
No one is picking on anybody if they choose to disagree with these results. But I feel there is a level of despair, after facts have arrived, when people continue to stand by the original claims.

Again, it just scares people and can even put flocks in danger when they start refusing to feed appropriate food.

I'm not sure if this is what you were saying, I've only skim read the last few pages, forgive me if I'm getting the wrong idea.
 
I'm somebody now!
steve martin 1970s GIF
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom