So, I'll say it again; at least the OP took charge of the situation.
To Docs point, did he need to shoot it? No. He could have done something else. He could have lured it in and befriended it. He could have shooed it away, trying to ignore it. But at least he took action instead of wringing his hands.
The animal wasn't left in the wild to possibly suffer and die of disease or fall prey, itself. It wasn't allowed to potentially prey on his chickens, or anyone else's, either. He also did not complain about the "bad" citizens of the world, those wicked souls who would allow some poor kitty to wander free.
No, he took decisive action, even if it was deemed distasteful. And if truth be told, it's one cat. Sorry, but there it is - one cat is gone.
Did he do the right thing? Yeah, he did.
To Docs point, did he need to shoot it? No. He could have done something else. He could have lured it in and befriended it. He could have shooed it away, trying to ignore it. But at least he took action instead of wringing his hands.
The animal wasn't left in the wild to possibly suffer and die of disease or fall prey, itself. It wasn't allowed to potentially prey on his chickens, or anyone else's, either. He also did not complain about the "bad" citizens of the world, those wicked souls who would allow some poor kitty to wander free.
No, he took decisive action, even if it was deemed distasteful. And if truth be told, it's one cat. Sorry, but there it is - one cat is gone.
Did he do the right thing? Yeah, he did.