Before you flame me to hell, i know this pertains to humans BUT it is something to very carefully consider. This isn't just speculation, it has been documented.
I do FF but i want to carefully examine all the facts and i'm wondering if anyone has FF their flock LONG TERM and seen any additional benefit or loss??
http://blog.arkofwellness.com/fermented-food-a-no-go/
I think Kassaundra has been doing it the longest here on BYC and I've not met or read of anyone doing it in the private sector that was doing it at all until we opened these two threads on it.
As for the article, you need to read very closely....there were many qualifiers that contributed to health problems in those cultures and diets and not just fermented foods or lactic acid. There have been far, far, far too many studies done that contradict his theory. And, yes, it's just speculation and inference unless there are specific sources cited and one can read those studies firsthand and see if there were other contributing factors that could cause such things besides the consumption of lactic acid.
Like this paragraph...just including it seems like it supports his hypothesis, but read the whole thing and you will find there were many, many mitigating factors that caused these people's problems and lactic acid wasn't one of them. I'll highlight in blue the words to watch for when someone is building a case on circumstantial evidence....
Quote:
Quote: Quote: A person could do this all day long with an article such as this one, but you get the point....the man or whoever wrote the article has taken vague "facts" and worded it in such a way as to place fermented or preserved foods as the deciding factor in all these poor outcomes and risks but if you read more closely you find there are several mitigating factors and the author has cleverly used phrasing to suggest otherwise by pinpointing and focusing on the words "fermented", "preserved", and "lactic acid".
I wouldn't get too wound up over one article by one doctor or someone getting scared over what one doctor has said. If the LABs were causing an inflammatory response in these chickens we would know it by now...their lives are much shorter than ours, their metabolic rate much higher, so any disease process or inflammatory response is much quicker and will have its "long term affects" in a much shorter time than what we consider long term. I think anyone even using them for a year or more on the same chickens would have already seen these changes and inflammatory responses or a rise in cancer in their flocks by now if that was going to be an issue.
The additional benefits have already been documented by many for the past couple of years, the losses? I've not heard of any that could be contributed solely to the FF yet. Who knows? We could see long term changes in the flocks with a decrease in lay over time or decrease in fertility, etc. but we've seen nothing yet.
Never fear....I'm watching for any changes over time as well that I would consider being contributed towards the FF. I'm not so stuck in a groove that I can't be objective over it...that's the nature of an experiment and one never stops weighing the benefits and merits of any one method if they have any smarts about them.