FERMENTED FEEDS...anyone using them?

Unfortunately, there are many mindless people who like lemmings will follow a snake-oil salesman down to the depths. I'm glad There are many that have intelligence that allows us to really understand things for what they really are. Then make choices from the wisdom that we currently have. Always trying to add to that understanding daily.
 
I rest my case. :cool:   See?  I'm not so paranoid after all...we mention them, and they come arunnin'.  ;)   Funny how someone who hates FF seems to be hanging around the FF thread right when we are discussing that phenomenon.  Coincidence?  I think not. 


I've shaken my magic 8 ball and it tells me that as soon as they can figure out packaging and comply with USDA regulations, fermented chicken feed will be manufactured and marketed to the masses. Look! Full of probiotics!! Guaranteed your chickens will eat less! {Only $39.99 a lb!}

Shall we start a betting pool on when it hits stores? :D
 
I've shaken my magic 8 ball and it tells me that as soon as they can figure out packaging and comply with USDA regulations, fermented chicken feed will be manufactured and marketed to the masses. Look! Full of probiotics!! Guaranteed your chickens will eat less! {Only $39.99 a lb!}

Shall we start a betting pool on when it hits stores?
big_smile.png

I think you are correct! You'll get no betting from me...as soon as they find a way to package and stabilize it by adding some weirdo chemicals they will have it on the shelves.

I'm willing to bet there are blog sites out there right now trying to do a deal with a corporation on the patent rights...
gig.gif
Some folks will sell their soul to the devil for a few bucks and a platform.
 
Okay Corporate Greedists, here is how you do it:

Take a 5 gallon bucket. Put 2 gallons of chicken feed in the bucket. Put a lid on the bucket. Put your cute corporate logo on the front label, mention "probiotics!" and "yummier eggs" and "drier droppings" in big type. On the back label include instructions that say "Remove lid, fill to within 4 inches of the top of bucket with water, stir. Do not reseal lid. Feed as soon as water is absorbed, or wait a minimum of three days for maximum benefits. Not necessary to feed entire contents of bucket in same day. Once moistened, stir daily at feeding time."

That's got to be worth a minimum of $22.50.

"Refills" could sell for $12.50. For what? 10 lbs if feed?

You're gonna get rich(er)!
 
Can you imagine how many more staff they would have to put on in their customer service departments to field all the questions?
lau.gif
It takes whole threads full of people to answer the questions here. Yep...they'd have to outsource that to another country also to save costs.

Do you think they would list the oil of snake in the ingredients list?
big_smile.png
 
BK answered this, but I'll add ...

There are lots of people willing to sell you lots of things (because it benefits them) that either aren't really things or aren't really necessary or are "free" for the finding, and we've grown to expect and even prefer to buy things because somehow we've been persuaded that they are "better," so we're easy "marks." I think the psychology behind this is pretty universal. It's called "marketing." Snake Oil.

The Fresh Eggs Daily blog is pretty good in letting you know who the sponsors are ... so just follow the money. The writers of that blog seem to try to keep an objective perspective, but I think that has got to be hard. It's hard for everyone, which is why "double blind" testing is the preferred "scientific method."

Even "free" information can come at a steep price, or have a hidden agenda. What I like to say is "Misery does love company, but NOTHING loves company like a bad idea!" If we have a nagging feeling that doing something might not be right, we can take a LOT of comfort in company in the other people doing it with us. The bigger the crowd around us, the more comfort we receive. So I dig for supporting information for advice, ESPECIALLY popular advice, and then I dig a little further. So much "science" is sponsored by for-profit companies these days ... then marketed ... then a little "cult" forms around it ... and Viola! Company!

Ugh.

Back to marketing ... In the USA how we seem to be a bit different is that we seem to prefer to buy things ... foods in particular ... that are marketed to tell us what they DON'T have. Fat Free! Lower Sodium! Sugar Free! And so on. Other cultures find this amusing ... paying for what you're not getting. We like to pay more for foods that don't contain what we expect them to contain. I think it gets really weird sometimes. I remember once someone bringing me a box of corn-based breakfast cereal. "Hey look! I bought this for you because it is healthy and I know you are really into health foods." I said, "It's breakfast cereal ... it's one of the least healthy, most marketed and therefore overpriced & useless, 'foods' at the grocery store." They said, "It's Gluten Free!" Well, I would expect a corn to be gluten free ...
roll.png


Except of course at the grocery store you can't trust something called "corn" to contain any actual corn.


This is what is so brilliant about this FF. The more I research fermentation in general, the more I find that different cultures have been fermenting cereal grains (the stuff we feed to chickens) and other foods for AGES. They do this to make the food taste better, and to keep the food from spoiling. There is also evidence that cultures have been fermenting food for ages because they figured out long ago that fermentation ALSO boosts the nutrition of the food ... helps people stay healthier. And I've found science to prove it ... from a reliable source. Win, win, win, win.

The thing is so often "science" doesn't trust these traditional methods, and/or industry resents that these methods are "free." What can happen is appalling ... persuading "poor" populations they need to abandon traditional local foods in favor of imported industrial foods is pure evil, IMO. When we replace the essentially free traditional foods with industrialized "equivalents" that speed up the process and "simulate" the textures and flavors of those traditional foods, we put a huge financial burden on the populations, which can be devastating enough by itself, but we also take away the nutrients those cultures lived off of for hundreds/thousands of years ... so we make them sick. Some of that is innocent shark jumping, some of it is intentional malice.

Take Corn, for example. Back in the day Europe had never heard of corn. Corn is an "American" thing. They didn't know America existed. Traditionally, corn was mostly prepared by soaking it in a lime solution. Then it was ground ... by hand ... and after that it was used for food. The soaking of the corn in the lime helped soften it for grinding, but it also release the full spectrum of nutrients in the corn. But we "industrialized" that process, brought in machine grinders so the corn didn't need to be soaked first. What we failed to notice was that without the soak, cornmeal lacks Niacin, and people who live on a corn-based diet started getting Pellegra, a niacin deficiency.

No problem ... some scientific genius found a way to squeeze some synthetic niacin into the industrial product, and then a marketing genius had the idea to stick that info in big letters on the cardboard box the "food" comes in. "Fortified!" Read as "Pay More!"

Ugh.

The thing about Canola, and Camelina, and Cottonseed Meal is that they are all industrial bi-products. Essentially they are waste products that can be turned into something sorta edible through a lot of processing. We've known for ages that Cottonseed Meal is not good for poultry or poultry products, so it isn't used much except maybe in areas where cotton is grown and they'd rather sell their industrial waste as animal feed than pay to have it dumped.

Ugh.

They have done a LOT to market the "health" benefits of Canola "foods" ... but IMO it still isn't really food. That's why I avoid Canola as much as possible.

I put Camelina in that same category, and am not that impressed by it's "No GMOs!" status. I'd rather know what it is (waste from the alternative fuel industry?) than what it isn't (GMO).

I've been searching for a super healthy and affordable alternative to patented & over sprayed & largely untested GMO soy in poultry rations, but Camelina is not my Eureka! At least not yet. I'll keep digging.

Cuz ... Seeing as I have to feed my birds, I at least want to feed them ... food.
goodpost.gif
Outstanding info and views.
 
Has anybody thought about if some poor kid did this and started a business that way? If a youngster did it, it's a good thing, if a big company does it, it's bad. I agree with Bee, but some poor city kid could get a good nest egg going. And yes, I see the point about the corporations, they'd probably put some sort of deadly filler in it and it wouldn't be good at all. But small-marketing it for people without the time/space to make FF is not a bad idea. I just think it all ought to stay small-business. And within reason. WHATEVER HAPPENED TO REASON?!!!
 
BK answered this, but I'll add ...

There are lots of people willing to sell you lots of things (because it benefits them) that either aren't really things or aren't really necessary or are "free" for the finding, and we've grown to expect and even prefer to buy things because somehow we've been persuaded that they are "better," so we're easy "marks." I think the psychology behind this is pretty universal. It's called "marketing." Snake Oil.

The Fresh Eggs Daily blog is pretty good in letting you know who the sponsors are ... so just follow the money. The writers of that blog seem to try to keep an objective perspective, but I think that has got to be hard. It's hard for everyone, which is why "double blind" testing is the preferred "scientific method."

Even "free" information can come at a steep price, or have a hidden agenda. What I like to say is "Misery does love company, but NOTHING loves company like a bad idea!" If we have a nagging feeling that doing something might not be right, we can take a LOT of comfort in company in the other people doing it with us. The bigger the crowd around us, the more comfort we receive. So I dig for supporting information for advice, ESPECIALLY popular advice, and then I dig a little further. So much "science" is sponsored by for-profit companies these days ... then marketed ... then a little "cult" forms around it ... and Viola! Company!

Ugh.

Back to marketing ... In the USA how we seem to be a bit different is that we seem to prefer to buy things ... foods in particular ... that are marketed to tell us what they DON'T have. Fat Free! Lower Sodium! Sugar Free! And so on. Other cultures find this amusing ... paying for what you're not getting. We like to pay more for foods that don't contain what we expect them to contain. I think it gets really weird sometimes. I remember once someone bringing me a box of corn-based breakfast cereal. "Hey look! I bought this for you because it is healthy and I know you are really into health foods." I said, "It's breakfast cereal ... it's one of the least healthy, most marketed and therefore overpriced & useless, 'foods' at the grocery store." They said, "It's Gluten Free!" Well, I would expect a corn to be gluten free ...
roll.png


Except of course at the grocery store you can't trust something called "corn" to contain any actual corn.


This is what is so brilliant about this FF. The more I research fermentation in general, the more I find that different cultures have been fermenting cereal grains (the stuff we feed to chickens) and other foods for AGES. They do this to make the food taste better, and to keep the food from spoiling. There is also evidence that cultures have been fermenting food for ages because they figured out long ago that fermentation ALSO boosts the nutrition of the food ... helps people stay healthier. And I've found science to prove it ... from a reliable source. Win, win, win, win.

The thing is so often "science" doesn't trust these traditional methods, and/or industry resents that these methods are "free." What can happen is appalling ... persuading "poor" populations they need to abandon traditional local foods in favor of imported industrial foods is pure evil, IMO. When we replace the essentially free traditional foods with industrialized "equivalents" that speed up the process and "simulate" the textures and flavors of those traditional foods, we put a huge financial burden on the populations, which can be devastating enough by itself, but we also take away the nutrients those cultures lived off of for hundreds/thousands of years ... so we make them sick. Some of that is innocent shark jumping, some of it is intentional malice.

Take Corn, for example. Back in the day Europe had never heard of corn. Corn is an "American" thing. They didn't know America existed. Traditionally, corn was mostly prepared by soaking it in a lime solution. Then it was ground ... by hand ... and after that it was used for food. The soaking of the corn in the lime helped soften it for grinding, but it also release the full spectrum of nutrients in the corn. But we "industrialized" that process, brought in machine grinders so the corn didn't need to be soaked first. What we failed to notice was that without the soak, cornmeal lacks Niacin, and people who live on a corn-based diet started getting Pellegra, a niacin deficiency.

No problem ... some scientific genius found a way to squeeze some synthetic niacin into the industrial product, and then a marketing genius had the idea to stick that info in big letters on the cardboard box the "food" comes in. "Fortified!" Read as "Pay More!"

Ugh.

The thing about Canola, and Camelina, and Cottonseed Meal is that they are all industrial bi-products. Essentially they are waste products that can be turned into something sorta edible through a lot of processing. We've known for ages that Cottonseed Meal is not good for poultry or poultry products, so it isn't used much except maybe in areas where cotton is grown and they'd rather sell their industrial waste as animal feed than pay to have it dumped.

Ugh.

They have done a LOT to market the "health" benefits of Canola "foods" ... but IMO it still isn't really food. That's why I avoid Canola as much as possible.

I put Camelina in that same category, and am not that impressed by it's "No GMOs!" status. I'd rather know what it is (waste from the alternative fuel industry?) than what it isn't (GMO).

I've been searching for a super healthy and affordable alternative to patented & over sprayed & largely untested GMO soy in poultry rations, but Camelina is not my Eureka! At least not yet. I'll keep digging.

Cuz ... Seeing as I have to feed my birds, I at least want to feed them ... food.
Good points. :) I get the whole advertising thing. I laugh at all the products being sold as "gluten free" these days that would never have gluten in them anyway. Marketing. Jumping on the band wagon and stating the obvious. But I guess people don't get the obvious anymore.
hu.gif


The Fresh Eggs Daily book doesn't promote any products (unlike the blog and FB) and it has a great list of safe and not safe herbs and foods to feed chickens. That is why I bought it. I think a lot of the advice in the book is sound and Lisa does like to test things, not scientifically though. More like I would do it, if I wanted to know something. And yes, I know she hates this site.

I don't drain off any water (neither does Bee) because it's too thick. Mine is the consistency of grout or oatmeal.
Good to know. I hand't thought about what consistency to get it too.

Sure...juice some apples, put in a jug, leave it open to air and wait.

Oops...don't forget the oil of snake.
wink.png
lau.gif


Unfortunately, there are many mindless people who like lemmings will follow a snake-oil salesman down to the depths. I'm glad There are many that have intelligence that allows us to really understand things for what they really are. Then make choices from the wisdom that we currently have. Always trying to add to that understanding daily.
Very unfortunate. I am trying to teach my boys not to be like this. BTW, did you know that lemmings really don't go over cliffs? That was all a stunt by some camera people way back when. Lemmings actually have more sense than some people. ;)

I've shaken my magic 8 ball and it tells me that as soon as they can figure out packaging and comply with USDA regulations, fermented chicken feed will be manufactured and marketed to the masses. Look! Full of probiotics!! Guaranteed your chickens will eat less! {Only $39.99 a lb!}

Shall we start a betting pool on when it hits stores?
big_smile.png
yuckyuck.gif


Okay Corporate Greedists, here is how you do it:

Take a 5 gallon bucket. Put 2 gallons of chicken feed in the bucket. Put a lid on the bucket. Put your cute corporate logo on the front label, mention "probiotics!" and "yummier eggs" and "drier droppings" in big type. On the back label include instructions that say "Remove lid, fill to within 4 inches of the top of bucket with water, stir. Do not reseal lid. Feed as soon as water is absorbed, or wait a minimum of three days for maximum benefits. Not necessary to feed entire contents of bucket in same day. Once moistened, stir daily at feeding time."

That's got to be worth a minimum of $22.50.

"Refills" could sell for $12.50. For what? 10 lbs if feed?

You're gonna get rich(er)!
lau.gif
Reminds me of the cans of dehydrated water they sell. :)

Can you imagine how many more staff they would have to put on in their customer service departments to field all the questions?
lau.gif
It takes whole threads full of people to answer the questions here. Yep...they'd have to outsource that to another country also to save costs.

Do you think they would list the oil of snake in the ingredients list?
big_smile.png
Oh my! Don't even go there! lol!

Has anybody thought about if some poor kid did this and started a business that way? If a youngster did it, it's a good thing, if a big company does it, it's bad. I agree with Bee, but some poor city kid could get a good nest egg going. And yes, I see the point about the corporations, they'd probably put some sort of deadly filler in it and it wouldn't be good at all. But small-marketing it for people without the time/space to make FF is not a bad idea. I just think it all ought to stay small-business. And within reason. WHATEVER HAPPENED TO REASON?!!!
I believe reason flew out the window in this country.
 
Has anybody thought about if some poor kid did this and started a business that way? If a youngster did it, it's a good thing, if a big company does it, it's bad. I agree with Bee, but some poor city kid could get a good nest egg going. And yes, I see the point about the corporations, they'd probably put some sort of deadly filler in it and it wouldn't be good at all. But small-marketing it for people without the time/space to make FF is not a bad idea. I just think it all ought to stay small-business. And within reason. WHATEVER HAPPENED TO REASON?!!!

I thought of a few "ad ons".

Put a scoop/strainer/stirrer & a FF trough in the bucket (telescoping?). Sell it as the "Fermented Feed Starter Kit."

Put a couple handfuls of alfalfa in the bucket with the feed, and call it Fermented Pasture.

Put it in a CUTE bucket and sell it in Target right next to the "method" brand soaps & stuff.

Put it in a Euro Cute bucket and sell it at IKEA.

Put it in an upside-down looking bucket and sell it at MOMA.

Put it in an orange bucket and sell it at Home Depot.
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom