I am aware that most (NOT all) studies say that there is no nutritional difference between fertilized and non-fertilized eggs BUT: History teaches us that there are a LOT of older people (people between 90 and 105+ yrs old) that have the commonality of having been raised on farms and eating fertilized eggs all of their lives. Of the four centurians <sic> in my family; I have an aunt that is approaching 106 yrs old who has eaten two eggs for breakfast for as long as she can remember - w/ NO health problems! Just take a minute to ponder how many people you know that grew up eating fertilized eggs and consider their health. (Lower internal cancer rates etc. - especially prostate and cervical) With the mountain of evidence to the contrary; I do not understand why someone would believe a study performed in a lab somewhere using chemical detection practices before they would believe what they see and KNOW w/ their own eyes and experiences! I would like to hear contradicting evidence ( or supporting evidence!) if rationally presented in a non-hateful manner! <Robt.>