- Thread starter
- #91
Arielle, I think your Buckeyes will do well. The climate differences will only be a problem when there is drastic immediate change. I also believe they were a good choice. I think they will pro to be an excellent dual purpose bird.
I like having it all in one breed. I do not see a need in one for eggs and one for meat. But, I prefer to emphasize the eggs and enjoy the meat as a bonus. I believe rearing poultry on a small stead is more efficient that way. I have to rear my replacement flock, and the extra cockerels should be useful. I am feeding more pullets/hens through out the year, so they need to earn their keep. When they can't, I want them to be a meal. My meat comes from my dual purpose laying flock.
I like the Nankins myself. I have also considered them. They are delightful little birds.
A friend of mine breeds Blue Wheaton Ams, and hers actually behave like chickens. The males help raise the young etc. They are reasonable layers of colorful eggs, and they have enough meat on them to make a meal. They are good looking birds even that I had to get used to the beard etc.
If I could have it all, the buckeyes would lay blue eggs. lol
We eat a lot of eggs but I'm ok with the lower production of the BUckeyes. THe fewer the eggs, the less feed needed to produce said eggs. I had 3 turkey eggs for dinner, so I eat eggs for any meal, and do eat a fair number of them. I need to find my Feeds book. I have never read the section on chicken and poultry since the exams for those sections so would like to refresh that information. Having said that, I do remember that egg production required an increase in protein and calcium especially for each egg produced. So in theory, the buckeyes should eat less feed with less egg production.
Out of the 26 birds, DH said he counted 7 hens. THat means a LOT of males for the eating, once I sort them out and decide the keepers. LIttle nervous to tackle that yet.