Well bluerose, everyone is entitled to their opinions
I would just like to add a little of the other side of the story:
Quote:
Scientific research has failed to find any difference between the hardness of white vs black feet.
OTOH there *is* a lot of decent anecdotal evidence to the contrary -- lotsa horses with 1 white foot that is splittier or crumblier or doesn't hold shoes as well as the others, and lotsa good long-time farriers who swear that their experience is that there's a difference.
Since research only tests certain parameters and averages over a very mixed bunch of horses, as a scientist I would not entirely reject the possibility that there *may* be a real difference in many cases. WHo knows.

Quote:
Scientific research has failed to find any difference between the hardness of white vs black feet.
OTOH there *is* a lot of decent anecdotal evidence to the contrary -- lotsa horses with 1 white foot that is splittier or crumblier or doesn't hold shoes as well as the others, and lotsa good long-time farriers who swear that their experience is that there's a difference.
Since research only tests certain parameters and averages over a very mixed bunch of horses, as a scientist I would not entirely reject the possibility that there *may* be a real difference in many cases. WHo knows.
2. Standing in mud (as long as it is clean mud- ie, not mud created from urine/manure but water) is typically good for the foot
Well, the worst thing is repeated wetting and drying, especially if the wetting involves clay (as mud often does). Which most horses turned out in muddy paddocks do experience. Not that 24-hr-a-day wet feet is good either. But they ARE bad (are you by any chance living in a dry climate, bluerose? certainly in dry climates, keeping the foot from getting too dry can indeed be advantageous.)
A chronically soaked foot takes any little tiny weakness in the foot and magnifies it hugely, so that if you have a horse whose feet are going to crack or split or crumble, they are much more likely to when wet. You could argue that horses should be trimmed all their lives so well that they have no such weaknesses, but, meanwhile back in the real world...
Well, the worst thing is repeated wetting and drying, especially if the wetting involves clay (as mud often does). Which most horses turned out in muddy paddocks do experience. Not that 24-hr-a-day wet feet is good either. But they ARE bad (are you by any chance living in a dry climate, bluerose? certainly in dry climates, keeping the foot from getting too dry can indeed be advantageous.)
A chronically soaked foot takes any little tiny weakness in the foot and magnifies it hugely, so that if you have a horse whose feet are going to crack or split or crumble, they are much more likely to when wet. You could argue that horses should be trimmed all their lives so well that they have no such weaknesses, but, meanwhile back in the real world...

3. Hoof supplements do very, very little to help and really only serve to 'petrify' the foot- so yes, it helps the horn be harder but NOT healthier... A good trim, lots of movement and heel first landings, and a low sugar diet is the way to good hoof health. ESPECIALLY so in a potentially metabolically challenged horse.
And yet, horses with a good trim, lots of movement and (well, heel first landings comes back to a good trim) still sometimes do EVEN BETTER with a good supplement. Also, it is not always *possible* to get the very very best farrier in the world, and a good supplement can give you an extra margin of error. I am NOT in favor of supplements in general, personally, but this is the one that I would consider quite well justified in trying (from both personal experience, scientific research and the cumulative experience of a lot a lot of good horsemen over the years).
I would urge people not to listen to either bluerose OR me
but to do some reading and mull over the evidence themselves, weight it with the experience of good horsemen who've been around a long time and kept a lot of horses real sound in hard work (always remembering that they're not *guaranteed* to be right), and make up your own minds
JMO,
Pat
And yet, horses with a good trim, lots of movement and (well, heel first landings comes back to a good trim) still sometimes do EVEN BETTER with a good supplement. Also, it is not always *possible* to get the very very best farrier in the world, and a good supplement can give you an extra margin of error. I am NOT in favor of supplements in general, personally, but this is the one that I would consider quite well justified in trying (from both personal experience, scientific research and the cumulative experience of a lot a lot of good horsemen over the years).
I would urge people not to listen to either bluerose OR me


JMO,
Pat