If you do the research on fermentation, you will find that in many cases, the biological action of the fermentation process DOES result in the end product containing more nutrition than the beginning product. Add to that, the fact that fermentation breaks down the anti-nutrients, making the nutrients in the fermented grain more bioavailable, and... if you are willing to read the research, and to do an honest trial, you will find that fermented feed is superior. Here's an excerpt from a published study (on fermentation) in the article written by Tikki Jane at the bottom of my signature:
Animal or plant tissues subjected to the
action of microorganisms and/or enzymes to give desirable biochemical changes and significant modification of food quality are referred to as fermented foods (Campbell-Platt 1994). Fermentation is the oldest known form of food biotechnology; records of barley conversion to beer date back more than 5000 years (Borgstrom 1968). According to Steinkraus (1995), the traditional fermentation of foods serves several functions:
"1. Enrichment of the diet through development of a diversity of flavors, aromas, and textures in food substrates
2. Preservation of substantial amounts of food through lactic acid, alcoholic, acetic acid, and alkaline fermentations
3. Enrichment of food substrates biologically with protein, essential amino acids, essential fatty acids, and vitamins
4. Detoxification during food fermentation processing
5. A decrease in cooking times and fuel requirements"
Figure 4 – Influence of natural fermentation of cereals on
available lysine.
Data from Hamad and Fields (1979)
Figure 5 – Influence of natural fermentation of cereals on the thiamine content.
Data from Chavan and Kadam (1989)
This information was gleaned from a quick perusal of the first study in Jane's article. I'm sure if the reader is interested in learning, there are many more facts presented in her article.