The only way we're going to win the war on having Easter Eggers called Easter Eggers is when the hatchery lists them as Easter Eggers and puts in a single sentence that explains that these are commonly, though incorrectly, referred to as X, Y and Z.
Until then we're fighting what the individual read in a very reputable catalog/book/etc. McMurray even puts that their Ameraucana/Aracana chickens are _sometimes_ called Easter Eggers and are selected for egg color. They _are_ Ameraucana/Aricana's, theirs just aren't "show quality."
If I didn't know any better I'd assume that the two names were interchangable and "Easter Egger" was some lame made up name. After all, that's what the hatcheries typically say and if I'm going to pick whose right it'll be the multi-million dollar, ancient rare breed hatchery that had breeds I'd never even heard of before. Not the guy who's been raising chickens in his backyard for a year or two.
I know that sounds bad - especially since I know that backyard breeders can put an encyclopedia set to shame with the amount of chicken information they somehow manage to keep straight. But that's just how it ends up.
Does the APA take an official stance on Easter Eggers? Maybe if someone can make them an unofficial breed described on the APA site (if it hasn't already been done) then that'll give credibility to the argument. And it may encourage some hatcheries to be a little more descriptive about what they are selling. Hell, it may even encourage one or two to offer Ameraucana's in addition to Easter Eggers.
Though, I'd keep my Easter Eggers
Until then we're fighting what the individual read in a very reputable catalog/book/etc. McMurray even puts that their Ameraucana/Aracana chickens are _sometimes_ called Easter Eggers and are selected for egg color. They _are_ Ameraucana/Aricana's, theirs just aren't "show quality."
If I didn't know any better I'd assume that the two names were interchangable and "Easter Egger" was some lame made up name. After all, that's what the hatcheries typically say and if I'm going to pick whose right it'll be the multi-million dollar, ancient rare breed hatchery that had breeds I'd never even heard of before. Not the guy who's been raising chickens in his backyard for a year or two.
I know that sounds bad - especially since I know that backyard breeders can put an encyclopedia set to shame with the amount of chicken information they somehow manage to keep straight. But that's just how it ends up.
Does the APA take an official stance on Easter Eggers? Maybe if someone can make them an unofficial breed described on the APA site (if it hasn't already been done) then that'll give credibility to the argument. And it may encourage some hatcheries to be a little more descriptive about what they are selling. Hell, it may even encourage one or two to offer Ameraucana's in addition to Easter Eggers.
Though, I'd keep my Easter Eggers
