Well, I'm voting for the first time in a few weeks, so I thought i'd share a young-persons point of view...
In my opinion it's always been obvious: the people who MAKE more, can afford to GIVE more.
Why should we take the same amount from people who can barely survive, as the people who are rolling in money?
The rich people don't always work harder than the poor ones, and it's not like we're all laying around not TRYING to succeed.
1/50 people make more than 250,000 a year, which means that 49 people would be helped. 49 people would be able to make ends meet just a little better.
My parents both work fulltime, and have their entire lives; we're not anywhere close to reaching 6 figures a year, even with their combined incomes.
My brother and sister (and I until recently), both got healthcare paid for by the state, and my brother doesn't pay for his lunch in school because we can't afford it. I never paid for a single field-trip, but there are plenty of times in my memory that my parents went without food because there wasn't enough to go around.
This winter, there will be plenty of times that everyone in my house will have to sleep in the living room because we can't heat our house, and only have one decent heater.
Why should the wealthy get tax-breaks, while my parents can barely pay the bills?
I dunno, it's just my opinion~