Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. There is a person I heard of that doesn't drive with a license, registration or insurance, because he beleives it to be unconstitutional. This guy has been to court several times for the above reasons, every time he won. I don't know what info he uses, but it works. So this got me thinking. Couldn't the above listed Amendment, be used to keep chickens? Could someone clarify what it means by effects? Would that be silly to need a warrent for arrests? I just think it's right for someone tell you what you can and can't do with your property. Maybe it's stupid, but if someone were able to use that to keep chickens, then nobody would have to fight the city again. Maybe this is the wrong one. Isn't there something about right to privacy? It could maybe go under that?