Thanks for that link, I appreciate it. I do not have a link to that Good Housekeeping study, a long time ago and not nearly as scientifically rigorous as your links.
That first study was the most interesting, the one that showed the difference in CND (Unwashed control, non-dipped) and CWD (water control, water dipped). All of the others involved washing the egg in a solution that removed a significant portion of the cuticle.
The Cuticle Opacity declined tremendously in quail eggs in the unwashed and washed samples in just 14 days, almost 50%. As was mentioned in that thread you linked it would have been nice to have chicken eggs instead of quail eggs. The definition I found for "Opacity" is basically transparency. There are certainly things going on with the cuticle during incubation in an incubator. I imagine there are things going on under a broody hen also.
I also found this to be very interesting. The way I read it the chemicals in the treatments have a chemical reaction with the cuticle material, removing a lot of it but creating a new coating that is even more impervious that the cuticle material. That's the first time I've read anything like that. I'd always assumed the reason the commercial operations that wash the eggs had such good results with bacteria was that they practice such clean practices, did not allow any bacteria in the premises. Sounds like there is more to it than that.
Quail eggshell cuticle embodies abundant glycoprotein and dense pigment (D'Alba et al., 2017), which may have an interaction with SH, AA, and CA in the dipping solution and then dissolve or/and denature to form a viscous less permeable substance that blocked the eggshell pores. The lowered egg weight loss may therefore be explained by restriction of water vapor diffusion through these blocked pores after dipping treatment.
Anyway, I do not read these to say "most of the bloom is gone in 10 days". There are changes going on but I did not see anything that proved it was less effective. If you look at Figure 2 The hatched chicks, the results were comparable to the other treatments and significantly better than one.