Quote:
It is my understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) but it was the SAMENESS of the animals on each island (compared to similar animals on other islands/breedig populations) which helped Darwin with his theory... if the animal species on the Galapogos had all had the scatterbred appearance of the Icelandics, he would NEVER have been able to come to his conclusions. But the fact that these isolated breeding populations QUICKLY and COMPELTELY organized into UNIRFORM species is what gave him the clue.
Again, I'm just looking for proof that this phenom has happened ANYWHERE else with any other species... That would help me "believe"! Yes, I read the first several pages of this thread, plus other net research, and everyone basically says the same thing but I am failing to find SCIENTIFIC proof. I'm NO scientist! I can't spell any of those big words! : ) But I have done things like research the "blue" color in American Am Staffs to locate why it is unknown in "real" American pit bulls, for instance, and am willing to dig and do serious research before I make up my mind on something. And in NO WAY am I casting any doubt on the integrety of anyone selling Icelandics, as the few I know I know to be honest folks. But honest people can be wrong, or mislead. And every time I look at those chickens I say "genetics are inbred - appearance is scatterbred, how is that possible?" And by inbred I mean considering the very few number of chickens which "started" the breed 900 years ago, plus the very few used to start the breed in US.
Can anyone point me to the origonal Icelandic person's work on these birds? His genetic research for instance? And thanks for the kind words about my chicks, they are cute little dudes. Again, thank you for any and ALL info!
Diane Jessup
I don't have any of Jake's extensive education or credentials but I want to chime in anyway.
Mustangs
The wild mustangs come in any number of colors. In fact many breeds of different species have multiple colors listed in the standards. But most breeds have been bred for a trait to conform to that standard. the Icelandics have not. They have all the similarities that Jake mentioned (and white ear lobes) but they were never bred for a particular color.
If a polish has few head feathers it's culled not bred, if a golden retriever has the wrong hair type it is "pet quality" and not used for breeding, in the old days, before people started interfereing with breeds to "Standardize" their looks, there was more variety. In every corner of every world there are "poor quality" members of every breed and species, we call them culls or pet quality, we geld them, spay them, keep them from reproducing because they are not the way WE want them.
The Icelandics have suffered no such restrictions. If you look back in time, there was much more diversity to wild herds. In the present day, there is very little that hasn't been subjected to human meddling.
Just my two cents worth...