- Jul 17, 2009
- 10,878
- 66
- 291
Quote:
I think you need to tread carefully here...you are going to open a can of worms & a theological debate. Perhaps it is best to consider the undeveloped chicks as those who had a CHANCE to hatch, when they otherwise would not have. You could look at it as though you are presenting the developing egg opprotunity to hatch, rather than condemming a a un-developed egg to the frying pan.
Yea I agree with you about the can of worms... and maybe I was hoping just a little bit to open that can... as long as it stays civil! Chickens are soooo mass produced and people typically dont have the same emotional connection to chickens as to humans (except for maybe on this site) so maybe this is a way to have some of these discussions without the emotional aspect?
One would hope, but as ethics are closely related to emotions, I don't think you are going to be able to truly seperate them
Ethics
1. (used with a singular or plural verb) a system of moral principles: the ethics of a culture.
2. the rules of conduct recognized in respect to a particular class of human actions or a particular group, culture, etc.: medical ethics; Christian ethics.
3. moral principles, as of an individual: His ethics forbade betrayal of a confidence.
4. (usually used with a singular verb) that branch of philosophy dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions.
So, to question the ethics of incubating eggs, you are (perhaps inadvertantly) questioning people's feelings of right and wrong. Nothing wrong with that, but maybe this is not the best place to do it?
I think you need to tread carefully here...you are going to open a can of worms & a theological debate. Perhaps it is best to consider the undeveloped chicks as those who had a CHANCE to hatch, when they otherwise would not have. You could look at it as though you are presenting the developing egg opprotunity to hatch, rather than condemming a a un-developed egg to the frying pan.
Yea I agree with you about the can of worms... and maybe I was hoping just a little bit to open that can... as long as it stays civil! Chickens are soooo mass produced and people typically dont have the same emotional connection to chickens as to humans (except for maybe on this site) so maybe this is a way to have some of these discussions without the emotional aspect?

Ethics
1. (used with a singular or plural verb) a system of moral principles: the ethics of a culture.
2. the rules of conduct recognized in respect to a particular class of human actions or a particular group, culture, etc.: medical ethics; Christian ethics.
3. moral principles, as of an individual: His ethics forbade betrayal of a confidence.
4. (usually used with a singular verb) that branch of philosophy dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions.
So, to question the ethics of incubating eggs, you are (perhaps inadvertantly) questioning people's feelings of right and wrong. Nothing wrong with that, but maybe this is not the best place to do it?