We hatched Aracauna eggs from a breeder last year. Got 3 and they all turned out to be roos. It's really a numbers (odds and percentages) game if you're going to breed the birds because you can't really know what an individual's genes might throw out. One of the birds is great with double tufted with dark legs and pea comb while the other has an unacceptable huge comb and wattles but absolutely gorgeous coloring. It all depends on what kind of project you're working in IMHO. For us, they're pets. Our operation is small and we're not breeders.
I'm not being a stickler or anything. 90% of my flock is from the feed store or directly from a hatchery. I love and cherish these birds, but I would not place any of them in the same ring as birds of the same breed from a high quality breeder background. But at least overall, they actually resemble the breeds they are supposed to be, something that cannot be said for any of the British Araucana ads that I've yet to see posted here. The reason I post is to educate. Just like I post when people talk about their feed store 'Americaunas'. And it's the exact same thing--an Easter-egger may have the general shape of an Ameraucana, but there's more to it than shape. I have nothing against Easter-eggers, just like I have nothing against lesser quality birds, but it isn't right to call them something they're not. And it's especially not right to sell them as a 'good looking' specimen when they are that poor of quality IF they're even truly the breed they claim them to be. This is especially the truth for the Araucana derivative breeds, which already have enough trouble with identity as is. Heck, I hesitate to call the Blue Ameraucana I got from Meyer Hatchery a true Ameraucana, even though she truly is one, for this very reason! So many people are ripped off by people representing their birds as something they're not, and that is what I disagree with.