I hate to be the new kid on the block and already arguing, but, sometimes that's how we learn new and important things. I am no expert, especially in poultry nutrition. That's why I came here - to learn! I like the BYC members signature line that says to' make your good better and your better best'! That's what I'm trying to do in all facets of my life, including with my animals.
I worked in a health and nutrition store for 7.5 yrs. I learned right off that since I have 2 ears and 1 mouth that I could accomplish a whole lot more by listening to our customers. And I did. The huge number of people who came to us with animals in distress was unreal considering how many vets our small city has. Except in injury cases, almost every single health issue was cleared up by switching the animals to better quality food and water!!! And gang - we promoted homemade food ~ which for dogs and cats contained very little that we sold in the store ...i.e. we put the pets health before store profits! A customer brought us a copy of a study on the horrible effects of ethanol leftovers on dogs and pigs! Mind boggling ...especially since its not common knowledge amongst people who take such good care of their animals.
I can't find that particular report, but a google brought lots of others. Look at these 2 paragraphs from TruthinPetFood.com.
And Dr. Aldrich also reports on drawbacks: One drawback to DDGS is the potential to concentrate mycotoxins, especially given that fermentation and distilling do not destroy these mold metabolites. Nor is the ethanol industry obligated to operate under the same restrictions as the food and feed industries. In one extension report from South Dakota State University, mycotoxin concentrations for 2000 through 2007 were reported to be measurable in each testing year.
Interpretation: There is one problem, and its big
DDGS (left-overs from ethanol production) are extremely prone to a deadly mold that is known to be a killer of pets. Extensive research has shown its very risky. But remember, its cheap so its probably worth the risk.
Dr. Aldrich reports on research of DDGS (left-overs from ethanol production): To summarize this battery of studies, the inclusion of DDGS at up to 30% of dog diets was reported to be acceptable; but, digestibility, stool consistency and palatability were measurably diminished.
Interpretation: Using up to 30% of this cheap @#$% is fine, even though it wont provide much nutrition and will probably give the pet the runs (and big time gas!).
Follow the money trail - who stands to profit? Is it worth the risk of loosing our birds or the potential harm to our families health?