This past Friday I was reading our base newspaper and an active duty Air Force columnist quoted Wikipedia for a reference to Air Force history.
I shot her an e-mail and told her how unreliable Wikipedia is and how inappropriate it was for her as an Air Force member, writing in Air Force newspaper, to quote Wikipedia on matters relating to Air Force history. She apologized and then went on to say that the base historian had contacted her to let her know that the Wiki article was completely incorrect. Go figure...
I also had to shoot an e-mail to another writer for the same paper about her use of the term "jimmy-rigged" in an article. Now I've heard of jury-rigged or even its bastardized form, jerry-rigged, but never jimmy-rigged...
I shot her an e-mail and told her how unreliable Wikipedia is and how inappropriate it was for her as an Air Force member, writing in Air Force newspaper, to quote Wikipedia on matters relating to Air Force history. She apologized and then went on to say that the base historian had contacted her to let her know that the Wiki article was completely incorrect. Go figure...
I also had to shoot an e-mail to another writer for the same paper about her use of the term "jimmy-rigged" in an article. Now I've heard of jury-rigged or even its bastardized form, jerry-rigged, but never jimmy-rigged...