Is the angry reaction necessary? PLEASE READ POST #1 FIRST

[Silkie Princess]

I just think it's... Well not sure how to say that but a lot of arguments start by just pushing that reaction. Why does it have to be here? Like that's just my oppinion but. Yeah...


Why can't people just have an oppinion without having to react? Most people on here just angry react and don’t say anything. It’s weird You can't change people. I get that. But why can't we at least try to make this forum less nagative? I'm sorry if this sounds weird. But It does makes sense right?

-SP

 

[PippinTheChicken]

I've always wondered this too.

 

[cluckmecoop7]

I hate to get involved (again) but I agree. The forum has been getting more and more negative in the last couple months.

 

[JacinLarkwell]

I like it for when someone is doing something (ethically/morally wrong)

 

[TheOddOneOut]

Yes.

 

[Silkie Princess]

I like it for when someone is doing something (ethically/morally wrong)

That's true.. But most people don't use it for that

 

[Lovely Lettie]

I hate to get involved (again) but I agree. The forum has been getting more and more negative in the last couple months.

X2

 

[The Moonshiner]

Why do we need any of the reactions?
I get a lot of laughing reactions and getting laughed at hurts too.

 

[AngBantamLuv]

Yep, even seeking out threads to simply be negative, oh, i mean share their opinions ...i have a very long ignore list going!

I don't think there's much changing another adults bad habits.. just add them to your ignore list and find a pleasant group of duccle, silkie and bantam cochin regulars.

 

[Kiki]

No one will ever be able to control how each
individual chooses to use a reaction.

If it bothers you to see the reactions... just train your eye not to look at them.