Is this a good idea?

Here's a list of breeds and many of their characteristics from a human and humane point of view, not because they must be laying machines. http://www.ithaca.edu/staff/jhenderson/chooks/dual.html

This is the shorter list that Mr Henderson actually has had in his coop. You can look at the full list, which has LOTS more breeds on it, but this is a good start. I haven't found anyone who can find much wrong with what J. Henderson has to say.
 
Last edited:
Seems like you are thinking in the right direction.

Personally I would leave the rooster where he is, he may be a sweetie, but he could also be aggressive with children as well as hens.

You don;t need a rooster for eggs.

You may want one later for breeding but I think it would be better if you had reared it yourself, and it was used to you.

there are many people who have roosters they know and they take them to schools, but you never know with a strange bird. plus they have a lot of experience.
 
I am in agreement to get 3 or 4 either babies or pullets. (pullets are female chickens under a year old) You don't need a rooster to get eggs but if you do, the ratio is one rooster to about 6-8 hens. Roosters crow all the time, and all night long so if you have close neighbors, that may be a consideration.

Glad you are reading up and glad you have found this site. Welcome. Lots of great information and we just love it when someone asks for our opinions!!
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom