- Thread starter
- #11
I read the second link but didn't see the name of that hatchery.
I read how the study was flawed due to the fact that the chicks were not as healthy as they should have been or the food they gave them was subpar and so they couldn't tell if one breed was better than the other.
It was a long article and focused on the study not being reliable, the information didn't appear to be what I was looking for and so I didn't pick up the name.
So now that you are so obviously upset I went back and looked and it doesn't tell you where they are located or anything it just barely mentions the name and moves on.
As far as I could tell, between the two links you gave me the first one was how a woman felt duped by her food supply and the second one was about a failed study, the information regarding locating stock was not very clear.
The other poster gave me the information I was looking for not only regarding the name of the hatchery but her personal experience in raising them.
What is the big deal here?
I read how the study was flawed due to the fact that the chicks were not as healthy as they should have been or the food they gave them was subpar and so they couldn't tell if one breed was better than the other.
It was a long article and focused on the study not being reliable, the information didn't appear to be what I was looking for and so I didn't pick up the name.
So now that you are so obviously upset I went back and looked and it doesn't tell you where they are located or anything it just barely mentions the name and moves on.
As far as I could tell, between the two links you gave me the first one was how a woman felt duped by her food supply and the second one was about a failed study, the information regarding locating stock was not very clear.
The other poster gave me the information I was looking for not only regarding the name of the hatchery but her personal experience in raising them.
What is the big deal here?
