I'm 12 days into my first hatch with my new NR360. For the first day, humidity ranged between 35 and 45%, with the vent at about 45% open. I rolled up a bath towel and wrapped that around the unit base, just to cut down exposure to drafts and provide a bit of insulation for the water chamber (warm water evaporates better..). Since that, humidity is rock steady at 50.
I weighed each egg on a 1kg x 1g (capacity x accuracy) scale, twice, five days apart. In 5 days, 16 eggs have lost 24 g to evaporation - that's 1.5g per egg. Since the eggs started out at around 51g each, they've lost about 3% of their weight over 1/4 of their incubation, so they're on pace to lose 12-13% of their weight during the whole cycle. This is perfectly in line with something I found online, saying that 13% weight loss by evaporation is the target. (I'll find that source again and edit this to post a link..)
If the eggs were losing more weight faster, I would raise the humidity, and lower it if the eggs were retaining water. But it seems that the 50% reading on my unit (regardless of the actual "absolute" humidity value) is a good "reference" humidity to keep my eggs in line with the published evaporation rate. Ultimately, what matters is that the eggs are not losing too much or too little water. Monitoring the weight loss of the eggs is the most direct way to obtain the information to control that - and if I have to adjust my machine so it says "30%rh" to achieve the right evaporation rate, then that's what I will do.
Long story short.. I'm not yet equipped to determine the accuracy of either sensor/display on my incubator, but it is holding the values described in the manual (99.5°, 50% rh), and those values seem to be working well, at least with respect to keeping water evaporation in line with published advice. My towel "scarf" definitely helped with stability of the readings.
(To be honest, I'm barely equipped to measure the weight loss.. the 1g resolution of my current scale is too "blunt" to really evaluate weight loss per egg. (Right now it looks like "these 8 eggs lost twice as much as those 8 did (2g vs 1g..).) It's only by averaging 16 eggs of data that I have any confidence at all in my result so far. I have another scale (1000g x 0.1g, 10x more resolution, $16) arriving tomorrow - I'll repeat the weighing when it comes and again 5 days later, and use the better data to tune my humidity better..)
Finally.. because relative humidity is defined for specific temperatures, an inaccurate temperature sensor can affect the humidity reading too. If the air is really 2° warmer than the displayed value, then the same amount of moisture in the air is a lower rh (because warmer air has a higher capacity to hold moisture, so the 100% humidity "ceiling" is higher, and a given mass of water vapor per volume of air, is a smaller percentage "relative" to that higher maximum. If the unit's temp measurement is an input to calculating its rh display, then the error is compounded..