- Thread starter
- #91
- Feb 26, 2016
- 133
- 47
- 104
Maggots feed on dead flesh. They will not cause a wound.
There is a surgery known as larval debridement therapy where fly lava (maggots) are placed in the body to eat away at dead flesh but leave the live stuff alone. If they caused wounds, then this type of thing would not be possible.
sorry, that is just an example I'm using but I guess you understand me.
Yep, I've seen it debated in other threads whether maggots cause or heal wounds.
The difference in this case is the feathers around the skin are making a nonsterile environment for bacteria to fester which causes the necrosis that feeds the maggots in a self-perpetuating cycle. I'm not suggesting that the maggots are eating live tissue, but the existence of the maggots are causing the dead tissue which they then feed on.
Also it was pointed out in the other threads that the fly larva used in surgery are specially developed for that. I don't know how true that is.
I've heard stories of people being healed by maggots, but that's human skin that isn't covered in feathers.
What I know for sure is there was no wound before the maggots came, then suddenly half her back is one big abrasion. Even if we assume there may have been a small wound that originally attracted the maggots, how do we explain the growth of the wound to cover nearly half her back? If I had let it continue, the duck would be dead now, not healed by the maggots.
So it seems pretty clear that the maggots can cause wounds by some mechanism.