U_Stormcrow
Crossing the Road
I looked at doing CRP as well, because I have a lot of land I'm not using - but it would have cost me more to enroll it in CRP than the program would have paid for me to keep it there... Payments were less than $60/acre (mostly under $37/acre), and they wanted me to do a bunch of underbrushing as part of the program - by fire, they recommended. I can't do a 25 acre controlled burn for under $2,500 - the program would pay me $925 or so. My "crop", arguably, is virgin timber. and my lands are marginal and subject to erosion - I'm at the top of one of the few "hills" in FL.The CRP program has a much diminished impact on total food production than it did 20 and 30 years ago. Additionally the criteria for enrolling land into CRP are much different and more stringent from an environmental and conservation perspective. So yes we have less farmland in production because of CRP but the impact is not huge.
A bigger impact is urban sprawl, that takes more prime farmland out of production than the CRP program.
I'm sure there's a trick to maximizing program payments, but I don't know what it is.
Now, if you happen to be one of the biggest private landowners in the US (Bill Gates), CRP does pay a significant chunk for you to leave your land fallow. But he could make more farming it, if that was his desire (assuming he did it well, of course).
Last edited: