A mate of mine has answered one question: May, June, July, and August is 'the mating-season.’ The actual matings continue over the four months, so a clutch could hatch at the end of October, that is, eight weeks after the last mating of the season.
Forgive me if I seemed to have flown off on tekerlodjikerl tangents. The more I observe, the less I understand, and the more interested I become. I am dismayed at the number of things that I just haven’t paid attention to. For example, this ‘range thing’ – how far do birds travel to get what quality of food? – is fascinating. Pop up and find the picture of the grassy glade at dusk. Looks Yummy for (Wild) Emus, doesn’t it? Nup! No blessings at all. What about the bush right beside it, which is gums with little else? Nup! No blessings there either. What about this dam here among the gums? It’s only a hundred yards from the track that the flock uses, but they don’t drink there (no tracks). So, I’ll take a deep breath, and keep quietly trying to work this one out.
Mohawk is here for a fourth morning, grazing just feet away from my birds. It doesn’t seem to be a romance thing, so why do they tolerate him?
One thing I’ve noticed (I think . . . ) is that the pairs of birds I see on the Net often seem so similar. Is that because the eggs that the owners incubated came from the same male and female? But ahh!! in the wild, there would likely be a mixture of genes in the chicks of a single clutch!! Lots and lots of observation to be done here, guys – just step outside my back door, and see how different looking the three birds out the back are.
Wait, we’re going live:
[But first a bit in brackets. I’m back. My fingers are so cold I can’t type properly. Is it possible that ‘Mohawk’ is actually the male that Felicity brought with her when she came back – ‘Foxtrot Charlie’? I didn’t get a look at F.C. This will make sense in a minute.]
Down the back, there’s a mosaic of environments.* First a strip of gums. Then a strip of bush. Then gums. Then bush. I went down to listen to a wild female that’s about a hundred yards away, down in the strip of bush behind the first strip of gums. It’s clearly some sort of ‘staging-point’ where my birds can meet wild birds on neutral ground.
It’s hard work, boys and girls!! There was frost on the ground around the cushion I was kneeling on – but there was a wild bird vocalising less than fifty yards in front of me. Sight and sound are such different instruments!! If the birds are in the open, you can see and hear them. If you are still, and they are vocalising, you have a chance of spotting them, though you may need to sit stock still for a half an hour to do so. If you can’t see them, and they don’t vocalise, and you move . . . game over.
So, it seemed that Greedy was away as I went down to try to observe the wild female. I kneeled and watched, then moved a bit. The wild bird spotted me (a lovely tall dark bird), and zipped through the screen of gums, down to the next clearing – I knew that because she started quietly calling again a few minutes later.
Then . . . Felicity and ‘Mohawk’ came past, obviously going to meet the female (!??).
Then I noticed Greedy standing quietly in the bush off to one side. I suppose it’s fair to assume that this is still mating-season goings-on.
[Two magpies were so busy fighting that they forgot to fly, and fell twenty five feet or more, squabbling furiously in mid-air, right in front of me, until the looming ground brought them back to their senses.]
Where was I? Oh yes, how different the birds are. Well, Mrs Eric, for example, has got to be a full six or eight inches taller than ‘Mohawk.’ The twins that I posted photos of at the beginning of the season were not only identical with a capital 'i,' they looked like they were about to step out onto the red carpet at The Big Film Premiere: beautiful symmetrical patterns, and every feather in place. ‘Mohawk,’ meanwhile, looks like an explosion in a feather factory with legs on. He could almost be a different sub-species!
What I mean is: am I seeing a gloriously broad range of genetic influences that are perhaps not present in the flocks of breeders?
[Conversely, all the birds here are necessarily rothschildi, whereas breeders may unwittingly have birds from different sub-species. I would be ecstatic to see a photo from a breeder who reckons that two birds in his/her flock are identifiably different sub-species!!]
*That’s why I posted the two pictures of side-by-side environments yesterday. Captive birds have, by and large, one environment. Theoretical pre-European-era emus had a range of environments, and/but:
we just can’t overstate, readers, how fantastically the environment here has changed since European settlement.
This has everything to do with me reaching helpful conclusions for BYC denizens, because this ‘third environment’ – my environment – is vestigial. That is, bizarrely, it’s not necessarily representative of the environment in which the species here evolved.
Supreme Emu