Hi, ya, Emu Hugger. No ticks visible. Could there be some beneath her feathers? Why not? Before I logged on, I’d already written’:
‘Perhaps I was fooled because what I saw was G. and F. fighting. This is ‘nature red in tooth and claw’ stuff. Greedy will either get well, and re-gain her mantle, or be dead within in a week.’
This is ‘The Thing,’ readers: I’m miles from anywhere, and too poor to fly vets in by helicopter. I don’t think that I’ve yet mentioned here on BYC that I’ve lost two other chicks. In brief: the score, out of five chicks, is two known dead, one I’m not sure about, and a runt spinster – Greedy is the fifth, and she’s only alive because, when she was injured as a chick, I just managed to save her from the others. On both occasions – when Greedy and Number One were injured – their siblings tried to kill them on the spot.
At times, I feel almost histrionic, focussing on detail detail detail; but it’s exactly what I see. For example, I have mentioned the pressure-cooker atmosphere here in the clearing. Would ‘my’ birds have done better if they’d hatched elsewhere? I don’t mean this is at all in a soppy way, but in respects of trying to understand. Captive birds live at least twice as long as wild birds, so ‘wildness plus wheat’ doesn’t seem like such a bad combination . . . except for the pressure-cooker thing . . .
Speaking of which: I’ve decided not to tame Boy Emu’s chicks, not to feed them at all. Indeed, ideally, he’ll choof off with them in tow. There are five birds of different degrees of tameness ‘in orbit’ here; and if we add, say, four or five more truly-tame chicks, the clearing will be a madhouse.
In closing, it’s worth noting that Greedy didn’t just sidle off into the bush to try to get well, but tackled Felicity for control of the clearing – abundance of food!! That’s why, at the end of the fig season, there’s actually a track worn around the fig trees, a track made by hungry wild emus willing to trespass on other birds’ turf to get something yummier than grass and seeds.
S.E.