We have been offering to help create a balanced way of keeping animals for small farm operations for over two (2) years now. The commissioners and MDARD have steadfastly refused to listen to us or even consider us a stakeholders in this game. The MDARD spokesperson (Jim Johnson) said yesterday that it is too difficult to include small numbers of animals and/or small farm operations. I suppose it is so since the GAAMPs were written for CAFOs after the 1999 amendment.I think the next step is to grass roots this to the state. Collect signatures and propose our own GAAMPS, one that allows X number of animals based on lot size, and not on abritrary zoning. Also ones that will not exempt CAFOs from environmental issues. If we can get people on board with the "No poisons in our water" then it wouldn't be hard to include a rider that will support suburban/urban farming.
The whole "you're not a farm if you are in residential" is BS anyways, because I could be a potato farmer on 2-3 acres, or have such a huge garden that I could run a CSA, but they don't consider that farming? ***.
However, the data for the care and feeding of small scale farm operations is already out there. It even covers manure output by species and minimal pasture area required and shelter requirements. This is a pretty easy task, any grad student could compile a comprehensive database as a semester project.
I did it for my MAEAP verification last year. My residential "farm" is recognized as a "real farm" by MAEAP, USDA, NRCS and has a ID with the Farm Service Agency.
It might be different in other areas but in my city there is an entrenched group that keeps getting re-elected despite the epic fails that they have visited upon the city. Some of the seats have been in the same family for decades and that makes it hard for a new-comer.Agreed... I also suggest, getting involved with your township, run for council...I've been thinking about it myself.
But do get involved, you just might be able to win and effect an improvement in your community.