I keep hearing what people think. its how its worded. .....................read below this is what they intend . It does not say wild muscovy or feral. It says very plainly to disalow private muscovy ownership. only meat production. Except for the ones grandfatherd in . And those are for food... read below, people are reading things into it that are not there.
> We intend to
>disallow private possession of muscovy
>ducks, except to raise them to be sold
>as food (which has been ongoing for
>years). However, we will allow
>possession of any live muscovy duck
>held on the date when this rule takes
>effect.
>In most every location, the muscovy
>duck is an introduced, invasive species.
>We will allow control of muscovy ducks
>as best suits the needs of the States and
>wildlife management agencies, who
>requested this authorization. Though
>the control order allows States and other
>entities to remove muscovy ducks, we
>do not expect that they will do so when
>the ducks are on private property.
>However, people who propagate
>muscovy ducks or allow them to
>multiply and move off their property
>should realize that the muscovy ducks
>may be subject to the control efforts that
>the State or local wildlife agency deems
>necessary.
>