Quote:
IMO, that's like saying folks shouldn't eat vegetable unless they can grow it themselves, or they shouldn't live in a house unless they can build it themselves (not w/a contractor). Some folks can just look at a plant and kill it, and some don't know a hammer from screwdriver (hopefully exaggerated here). Just because someone is adverse (too squeamish, too emotionally attached, or just plain ignorant of the process) to killing their own animals surely doesn't mean they shouldn't eat meat???
While I do in general view chickens as livestock, my girls are pets, to me no different from having 5 pet parrots. They are treated similarly to my pet cats and dogs (minus house priveleges unless being medically treated). I have no issues w/chickens being raised for food, nor do I have issues with someone who sticks a diaper on their house chicken
To be pedantic, I disagree. There is a difference between willing and able. Obviously, not everyone is able to build a house, grow vegies or process meat, but we pay others to do it. Its the whole system we live in where people perform specialised jobs, therefore we can have scientists, engineers etc who arent feeding themselves, but are (theoretically) researching ways to better our lives. Obviously those people are likely to be too busy to feed themselves.
However.
I think people should be willing to do the dirty work for what they want. While they may not be able to, I like to think that most people would be willing to build themselves a home if they had the time and the know-how. Similarly, I believe people dont deserve to have what they arent willing to work for.
While not everyone has time to hatch, raise, and process poultry, I think people should be willing to do the dirty work if they're going to reap the benefits.