As long as this man is alive, there won't be any enforcement of anything, which does sort of worry me a bit since one of his buddies could actually get his permission to plop down a mobile home across from my property (no insult meant to mobile home owners intended--it's in the restrictions).I can see him doing that because he doesn't want to have any argument with anyone. He's a bit of a milquetoast type. What I'd be more concerned with is new citified folks moving in and though no one can see my birds through all the trees, they can hear the roosters all around us, especially mine. We even have many "rooster villages" in this county, if you get my drift. Just so happens my own roosters would be closest to the neighbors in this development.
I think the vagueness of these restrictions he wrote would be to my good (or to my bad, depending). There is a hole you can drive a truck through in them. I just don't get how one person can restrict the rights of others simply because they are in regard to poultry, especially when the laws/restrictions are contradictory, i.e., the right to breed chickens, hence have a rooster, roosters crow, but the neighbors can say they want him gone. Whose rights take precedence, the ones of the folks who can't live and let live? Probably. Sad thing. Good discussion here. I appreciate the input.