The calcium in that supplment has me thoroughly puzzled. Why bother to put 4% or 5% calcium in it, when the supplement is used in such small amounts? (My best guesses: either to make it sound like it's got more nutrients, or for a reason having to do with texture or how the ingredients mix together or something like that.)and correction, I found Fertrell's "Poultry Show and Breeder Supplement" It has added Ca, definitely not good for your breeding Roos, a bunch of added Met (more than the standard, see above re: legal limits) and twice as much Lys as Met. The differences matter, but its similar enough to the standard Fertrell "Nutribooster" I thought was intended that the general thrust of my comments/views remain unchanged.
For the small amount used, I doubt the calcium makes much difference either way. 5% calcium in a supplement that is less than 2% of the total ration (1.25 pounds in 75 pounds of mixed ration) is adding less than a tenth of a percent calcium to the overall ration.
I would say the calcium in the layer crumbles would be a bigger concern, given that it's about two thirds of the whole ration.
