Need input - would this mix + Kalmbach work?

and correction, I found Fertrell's "Poultry Show and Breeder Supplement" It has added Ca, definitely not good for your breeding Roos, a bunch of added Met (more than the standard, see above re: legal limits) and twice as much Lys as Met. The differences matter, but its similar enough to the standard Fertrell "Nutribooster" I thought was intended that the general thrust of my comments/views remain unchanged.
The calcium in that supplment has me thoroughly puzzled. Why bother to put 4% or 5% calcium in it, when the supplement is used in such small amounts? (My best guesses: either to make it sound like it's got more nutrients, or for a reason having to do with texture or how the ingredients mix together or something like that.)

For the small amount used, I doubt the calcium makes much difference either way. 5% calcium in a supplement that is less than 2% of the total ration (1.25 pounds in 75 pounds of mixed ration) is adding less than a tenth of a percent calcium to the overall ration.

I would say the calcium in the layer crumbles would be a bigger concern, given that it's about two thirds of the whole ration.
 
My goal is to use readily available Kalmbach feeds as the base of the feed ration but increase the fat, fiber, vitamins and amino acids to better support the needs of a large fowl breeder flock.

The mix I am considering is this:

Mix:
50# Kalmbach 17% nonGMO layer crumbles
15# Kalmbach 20% nonGMO Flock Maker
3# Alfalfa meal
1.25# Fertrell Breeder Supplement
0.02# methionine
0.10# Lysine
1# corn oil
2# scratch grains
2# Sunflower meal
+ vitamin E oil - TBD

Total batch weight = 74.37 pounds

Mix value is in the front, recommended ranges pulled from the Poultry Breeder Nutrition facebook page in parenthesis.
17.8% protein (17% to 18%)
6.1% fat (5% to 7%)
5.3% fiber (5% to 7%)
1.15% Lysine (1% to 1.2%)
0.50% Methionine (0.45% to 0.55%)
75 IU/lb Vitamin E (80 to 120)

Any thoughts or concerns on this mix?
I have never had silkies so I didn't really look closely but noticed this at the feed store. Would this be helpful?
https://nutrenaworld.com/products/naturewise-silkie-and-ornamental-layer-feed/

Guaranteed Analysis
Crude Protein, minimum22.0%
Lysine, minimum1.2%
Methionine, minimum0.45%
Crude Fat, minimum4.5%
Crude Fiber, maximum5.0%
Calcium, minimum2.6%
Calcium, maximum3.6%
Phosphorus, minimum0.60%
Salt, minimum0.2%
Salt, maximum0.7%
Sodium, minimum0.1%
Sodium, maximum0.4%
Manganese, minimum80 ppm
Selenium, minimum0.3 ppm
Vitamin A, minimum4,500 IU/lb
Vitamin D3, minimum1,550 IU/lb
Vitamin E, minimum10 IU/lb
Thiamine, minimum1.1 mg/lb
Lactobacillus acidophilus, minimum5.1 mil CFU/lb
Lactobacillus casei, minimum5.1 mil CFU/lb
Bifidobacterium thermophilum, minimum5.1 mil CFU/lb
Enterococcus faecium, minimum5.1 mil CFU/lb
Contains a source of live (viable) natural occurring microorganisms.
 
The calcium in that supplment has me thoroughly puzzled. Why bother to put 4% or 5% calcium in it, when the supplement is used in such small amounts? (My best guesses: either to make it sound like it's got more nutrients, or for a reason having to do with texture or how the ingredients mix together or something like that.)

For the small amount used, I doubt the calcium makes much difference either way. 5% calcium in a supplement that is less than 2% of the total ration (1.25 pounds in 75 pounds of mixed ration) is adding less than a tenth of a percent calcium to the overall ration.

I would say the calcium in the layer crumbles would be a bigger concern, given that it's about two thirds of the whole ration.
I was thinking the calcium is coming from the fish meal in that stuff?
 
I was thinking the calcium is coming from the fish meal in that stuff?
I think fish meal is generally used as a source of animal protein, but I can see how some calcium might piggyback along with it if the fish had not been boned.
 
I have never had silkies so I didn't really look closely but noticed this at the feed store. Would this be helpful?
https://nutrenaworld.com/products/naturewise-silkie-and-ornamental-layer-feed/

Guaranteed Analysis
Crude Protein, minimum22.0%
Lysine, minimum1.2%
Methionine, minimum0.45%
Crude Fat, minimum4.5%
Crude Fiber, maximum5.0%
Calcium, minimum2.6%
Calcium, maximum3.6%
Phosphorus, minimum0.60%
Salt, minimum0.2%
Salt, maximum0.7%
Sodium, minimum0.1%
Sodium, maximum0.4%
Manganese, minimum80 ppm
Selenium, minimum0.3 ppm
Vitamin A, minimum4,500 IU/lb
Vitamin D3, minimum1,550 IU/lb
Vitamin E, minimum10 IU/lb
Thiamine, minimum1.1 mg/lb
Lactobacillus acidophilus, minimum5.1 mil CFU/lb
Lactobacillus casei, minimum5.1 mil CFU/lb
Bifidobacterium thermophilum, minimum5.1 mil CFU/lb
Enterococcus faecium, minimum5.1 mil CFU/lb
Contains a source of live (viable) natural occurring microorganisms.
I had looked at this for my silkies, then changed my mind on switching from Kalmbach's Flock Maker, as the price is $2 higher for 20 fewer lbs. The only noticeable gain I noted was just 2% more protein. I would switch if I thought it was better for them in any other ways, but I don't. They also get 1/4 dose of rooster booster granules added to it as well as CS/B and a little probiotics.

Kalmbach's
1765555282954.png
 
and this whole page is why I like more time when I post.

@NatJ Good catches! Yes, not sure why they are bothering to add Ca, given the low rate of inclusion in normal use, unless they intend it to be added to a "layer-type" formulation, where the "extra" CA, at normal inclusion rates, just mean the person mixing doesn't need to reformulate to hit a roughly 4-5% +/- Ca number. But even without, necessary adjustments would be quite minor.
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom