Yup, same here. Soup line, clay, soup line.*But again, my knowledge of clay is mostly cuss words...
* my home made, clean version of a cuss word.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yup, same here. Soup line, clay, soup line.*But again, my knowledge of clay is mostly cuss words...
Well in ancient times maybe to seal the surface to make something waterproof so it could hold liquid? Probably done with wood as well.actually, does anyone know any way in which beef fat would be used in the manufacture of ceramics? I rather suspect some confusion with animal fats being absorbed by some (notably, ancient) ceramics, so archaeologists can tell something about what the people who made the pot cooked or ate in it (but nothing to do with making the pot).
so a temporary modification rather than the manufacture of it per se? I too can imagine that (though I still think it would not qualify it for inclusion in that poster)Well in ancient times maybe to seal the surface to make something waterproof so it could hold liquid?
if memory serves correct, one of the hypotheses to explain the origin of pottery per se is that clay was used as a liner to make baskets waterproof; add fire (accidentally) and the basket burns away and, if lucky, one is left with a solid pot (though not a waterproof one in that caseProbably done with wood as well.
I'm not sure about that. My understanding is that glazes are tricky and it's easier to adjust the body of the clay to suit the glaze (they have to bind together in firing conditions that suit both of them) than the glaze to suit the clay, so glaze compositions are more conservative than clay bodies. I'll have a rummage in the library and see what I can find. Got some books on clay and ceramics somewhere.I can imagine maybe animal fat could be mixed in a glaze
it's motivated by trying to find a use for meat bones post BSE regulations, so the article linked at least isn't about historic use but may be inspired by historic production of bone china. I'm sure bones were calcined for that, so there wouldn't be any fat left by the time it met any clay.It looks like testing the application rather than production but I didn't see a date.
I think you meant to post this somewhere elseThe thing is, if you are commercially creating eggs, you want to do it on the least food possible without decreasing egg production which will decline on poorly kept birds. Food is expensive.
So you want a pretty consistent feed that meets needs, that chickens will eat and produce eggs.
Of course it is impossible to find something if it is not there, and so far I have drawn a blank. Clays and glazes are inorganic mineral substances; their additives are also. I find no trace of deliberate fat inclusion in anything I've looked at so far. I think the poster is just wrong in that respect (amongst others, like the bone byproducts; to which obvious adds are e.g. knucklebones, dice, and other game pieces - which are still made I find, though not nearly to the same quality as in times past https://scape-west.co.uk/shop/accessories/hand-carved-buffalo-bone-horn-chess-set/ ). And the bone (ash) in glass appears to be an error too; bone ash was used as a separator in mould-made objects, to facilitate removal from the mould, and sometimes stuck to the hot glass.I'll have a rummage in the library and see what I can find. Got some books on clay and ceramics somewhere.