new research debunks trad views on nutrition

On the avian sense of smell.

Birkhead 2012 Chapter 5 Smell, highlights:
Audubon was wrong on this. Anatomically birds have conchae, a scroll-like roll of cartilage or bone, in a chamber at the base of the beak. The more complex the conchae, the greater the surface area for scent-detecting cells. Close by are the parts of the brain that interpret this data, the olfactory bulbs. Both structures vary between bird species. Bang and Cobb published a comparative study of 107 species in 1968, showing a 12-fold difference in relative sizes of olfactory lobes. Domestic fowl scored 15 on their index; the average songbird came in at 10 and the Kiwi at 34. The link between relative size and olfactory ability was verified in the 1990s. The sense of smell is in general better developed in nocturnal and crepuscular species, but it's also very important for wanderers of the open ocean like albatross.

Ackerman The genius of birds 2016:266-72, highlights:
The olfactory bulb is an ancient part of the brain devoted to the sense of smell and found universally in vertebrates. It varies in size across animals in the same order, the same class, or the same family. This is true for birds. Since the 1960s nearly every species of bird tested has demonstrated some olfactory talent. Even songbirds (near the bottom of the scale) use smell: blue tits won't enter a nest box laced with the scent of a weasel. Zebra finches use smell to identify relatives and thus avoid inbreeding.

Ackerman Bird Way Chapter 4 The scent of sustenance, highlights:
A turkey vulture has 3 times as many mitral cells (specialist neurons) as a rabbit or cat, and can detect molecules from decaying flesh in concentrations as low as a few parts per billion. European starlings select aromatic herbs to line their nests and act as fumigants to protect nestlings. Puffins can find their way home by smell alone from nearly 500 miles away. Seabirds consume plastics and other trash because those plastics emit the same chemical scent (dimethyl sulfide) as phytoplankton generate when consumed by krill, and which the birds hone in on to find their food at sea. Ackerman calls such plastics a kind of olfactory booby trap for seabirds.
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_horned_owl
The most regular predatory association amongst relatively larger carnivores is that with skunks. Due to their poor sense of smell, great horned owls are the only predators to routinely attack these bold mammals with impunity. All six skunk species found in North America are reported as prey, including full-grown striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), which can be three times as heavy as the attacking owl.[7][85][116] In one single nest, the remains of 57 striped skunks were found.[117] Due to the proclivity of skunk predation, great horned owls nests frequently smell strongly of skunk and occasionally stink so powerfully of skunk that they leave the smell at kill sites or on prey remains.[15][118] Surprisingly, at least two cases of a great horned owl preying on an adult raccoon (Procyon lotor) have been reported.[119][120] One instance of an owl taking a bobcat (Lynx rufus) as prey was also reportedly observed.[88] Occasionally, domestic carnivores are also prey. A few cases of young or small dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)[121][122] and several of juvenile and adult cats (Felis silvestris catus) being killed by great horned owls have been reported.[7][113][123][124][125][126]
 
I’ve been afraid to eat any of the others
I don't think you need to worry. See https://www.poison.org/articles/styrofoam for some quality info on it.

Styrofoam is also digested by some insects, including mealworms. See e.g.
https://www.utmb.edu/mdnews/podcast/episode/a-styrofoam-eating-bug

Since the digestion is done initially by microbes in the GIT, it's quite possible that lots of animals can digest it, but so far only a few have been discovered to have this ability.
 
I don't think you need to worry. See https://www.poison.org/articles/styrofoam for some quality info on it.

Styrofoam is also digested by some insects, including mealworms. See e.g.
https://www.utmb.edu/mdnews/podcast/episode/a-styrofoam-eating-bug

Since the digestion is done initially by microbes in the GIT, it's quite possible that lots of animals can digest it, but so far only a few have been discovered to have this ability.
It's not poisonous, it's a possible endocrine interuptor .
Possibly cause cancer years later also. But are most things anymore.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36841402/

PSNP inhibited acetylcholinesterase and altered endocrine-related gene expression profiles both in the thyroid and glucocorticoid axes. At the whole organism level, we observed altered behaviors such as increased activity and anxiety at lower doses and lethargy at a higher dose, which could be due to a variety of complex mechanisms ranging from sensory organ and central nervous system effects to others such as hormonal imbalances. In addition, we present a hypothetical adverse outcome pathway related to these effects. In conclusion, this study provides new understanding into NP toxic effects on zebrafish embryo, emphasizing a critical role of endocrine disruption in observed neurotoxic behavioral effects, and improving our understanding of their potential health risks to human populations.
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom