Quote:
Right On! While I believe that you should be able to defend your animals from predators if need be, I would like to see people do some "preventative" defense for a change. How about proper & secure housing? These wild animals are paying the price for the lack of planning and effort put into a lot of people's poultry housing. That's not an (insert name of predator/hungry animal trying to eat the buffet laid out in front of him)'s fault. Factually, a lot less of this "defending my chickens" would be going on if there was more emphasis on predator exclusion.
If it's simply laziness then I agree, but if it is lack of funds and a person is just raising meat and eggs to support their family..then I say do what you have to do to protect your livelihood. If a person CAN put up better controls than just having a gun by the door, they should definately do so. This isn't too far off from letting dogs protect stock though. The only difference is a dog is doing the killing rather than a bullet(if that is even what happened). Also,roosters kill a hawk, and everyone cheers, but let someone shoot a hawk, and everyone jumps on the person. IDK, but it seems to me, if it is lawful to protect your livestock, then you should be able to do so within reason, and not have to argue your case to anyone else. I don't know what I would do in the same situation, nor does anyone else really if they have never been in that situation. Personally, I'm glad the chickens are safe, and hope the OP has no more issues. If he does, I say handle it however you deem necessary. Either way one animal generally has to die to protect another. Protect the owl=lose chickens. Protect the chickens=lose the owl either by dogs, gunshot, or starvation. One has to go. No way around it.