- Mar 20, 2013
- 551
- 186
- 221
I understand but a little confused though I think I could fill in the blanks I'm sure. The issue I'm having is each parent gives only one chromosome. So the Cameo and Purple gene are on different chromosomes. My guess is how they cross over is during meiosis some genes cross over. Which means 1/4 of the sperm cells carry Peach. Not sure if this is accurate but this is one of the only things I can think of. Or what I used to believe is that because the genes are mutated they're already unstable and makes it easier for new mutations to happen. I think it was Brad Legg that said it, but the point being is, new mutations appear more often when using split peafowl.
You aren't quite correct. Each parent gives one chromosome of each pair. Crossover happens between different chromosomes of each pair, meaning one Z will crossover with the other Z. Cameo and Purple are on the Z chromosome. Males have two Zs. It's possible for a male to look IB but have Purple on one Z and Cameo on the other. Or to have Purple and Cameo on the same Z, and neither mutation on the other. In either case, he'll look IB. When he produces sperm cells, each sperm will get one of each pair of chromosomes. And what often happens during meiosis -- when cells with pairs of chromosomes (diploid) become cells with one of each chromosome (haploid) -- is that each pair will sort of "twist together", and frequently where they cross, they'll exchange parts. So if a male has one Z with Purple and the other with Cameo, it's possible that after crossover he'll have sperm with recombined Zs -- some will have both Purple and Cameo together, and others will have neither. When Clifton Nicholson first bred Purple and Cameo together, he used the sons, which would have had one Z with Purple and one Z with Cameo. When those sons had daughters, among them were Purples, Cameos, Peach, and IB. The Peach and IB could happen only as results of crossover. And that they appeared in more than just one clutch indicates that it isn't a very rare thing.
Well, "new mutations appear more often when using split peafowl" is not really accurate. What's more likely is that these "new mutations" are actually new combinations of existing mutations, which come together when using birds split for multiple mutations. Breeders see something new, and think a new mutation is the cause of it. That might be the case, but it isn't necessarily so.
