Please help with these photos....

[Robin'sBrood]

Quote:
Well see, Laken velders don't have beards. and they have slate legs while he has white..

Then there's he is a bit too dark in the coloring/The coloring is in the wrong places to be a lakenvelder. He's closer to that of a D'anver bantam in color+ with the beard, but would still need to be cross to get that big/have white legs..

The other one could be a New hampshire but is too dark in coloring, So he would probably have rhode island red or something in the background to make him that dark.. Which is why i said "Production red" (Hatchery rhode island red)..

You can look around on feathersite and read up on the breeds. It'll help a lot in guessing them

I didn't even notice the beard on that 1st chick. See, I told you I'm no expert.

 

[mom2chicksandpups]

She could be a Lakenvelder and EE cross. The coloring is very similar to that of a Lakenvelder.

 

[Mahonri]

All roos.... especially if they are only 9 weeks.

 

[waibel zoo]

I think all roo's too.

 

[ArizonaDesertChicks]

I agree that every single one of them is definitely a roo.

#5 looks like a production red to me (looks just like mine, only masculine). I'm guessing that the rest of them are probably mixes. Top one has a beard with pink legs and a straight comb - strange mixture. I believe black australorps have grey legs, not yellow. #2 does not have the body shape of an orpington and the legs are also the wrong color. The person who sold them may have had all his chickens running together.