She was way sketchy and nervous at first kind of like a wild rabbit (we have grey ones in the area) so it made is wonder if they caught her and ended up not wanting her ?
That or she might her Cotten tail in her.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She was way sketchy and nervous at first kind of like a wild rabbit (we have grey ones in the area) so it made is wonder if they caught her and ended up not wanting her ?
Quote: That is impossible. North American wild rabbits and European wild rabbits (the domestic rabbit's ancestors) are only distantly related, and can't interbreed.
That is impossible. North American wild rabbits and European wild rabbits (the domestic rabbit's ancestors) are only distantly related, and can't interbreed.
thank youNo, that's a domestic rabbit; I'm 100% sure about that. She only slightly resembles a wild rabbit..
Quote: Very convenient that she didn't have any babies grow up . . . .![]()
That is only possible if it was a feral domestic. While it's true that most domestic rabbits that get dumped out wind up getting killed by a predator in short order, some manage to survive, particularly those that are chestnut in color. In urban settings, released rabbits have occasionally bred to such numbers as to become such nuisances, some municipalities have banned pet rabbit ownership within their city limits.
I sincerely doubt the identification of the rabbit in the video. Considering how bad some people are at ID'ing breeds on rabbits that are known to be domestic rabbits, it's highly likely that it wasn't a wild rabbit at all. Even if it was a wild cottontail, knowing male rabbits' tendencies to mount anything that doesn't try to eat them, even the breeding behavior is credible. But though people claim to have rabbits that are "part wild rabbit," I cannot find any case where someone has documented testing a domestic rabbit and finding that it had cottontail DNA. Everything I can find on the subject says that though breeding behavior between the species may have been observed, no live babies are produced. When this sort of cross is done in controlled conditions by people who know what they are dealing with, the embryos have been found to die within a few days of conception. Sorry, but until there is documented evidence from a credible source, I won't believe it is possible.
Very convenient that she didn't have any babies grow up . . . .![]()
That is only possible if it was a feral domestic. While it's true that most domestic rabbits that get dumped out wind up getting killed by a predator in short order, some manage to survive, particularly those that are chestnut in color. In urban settings, released rabbits have occasionally bred to such numbers as to become such nuisances, some municipalities have banned pet rabbit ownership within their city limits.
I sincerely doubt the identification of the rabbit in the video. Considering how bad some people are at ID'ing breeds on rabbits that are known to be domestic rabbits, it's highly likely that it wasn't a wild rabbit at all. Even if it was a wild cottontail, knowing male rabbits' tendencies to mount anything that doesn't try to eat them, even the breeding behavior is credible. But though people claim to have rabbits that are "part wild rabbit," I cannot find any case where someone has documented testing a domestic rabbit and finding that it had cottontail DNA. Everything I can find on the subject says that though breeding behavior between the species may have been observed, no live babies are produced. When this sort of cross is done in controlled conditions by people who know what they are dealing with, the embryos have been found to die within a few days of conception. Sorry, but until there is documented evidence from a credible source, I won't believe it is possible.
