Read this! You kids will not be able to work on your farm anymore!!

[Capvin]

I usually try to respond to your ridiculous statements with a statement that is even more ridiculous. This time, you have me beat. There is absolutely no statement that is more preposterous then whatever you said. But if you would like to know the health of the job creators in this country just take a look at the stock market and corporate profits. But let's run um out!! Maybe you will figure it out that the "job creators" are not interested in creating more jobs. They figured out that they can make more profits with much less people and those jobs will not be coming back.

 

[PDXcluck]

We already have good working child labor laws, this is another attempt by the Obama administration to derail industry in the guise of something good but in reality a subtle attempt to garner a whole class of people and funnel them into a social program killing the traditional methods of creating hard working young adults into welfare dependants. It is also an attack on the job creators of this country making it more inhospitable for investors to remain in America and create jobs. I am not sure if it is intentional or not but it is working, investors are leaving the country because the business climate is under attack by new regulations like this one and the threat of higher taxes and Obama's desire for higher energy costs.

You run the job creators out you run the jobs out as well.

This is really a ridiculous statement. I won't even bother deconstructing it...try again.

 

[Capvin]

This is really a ridiculous statement. I won't even bother deconstructing it...try again.

And all this time I thought it must be the water in Oregon that made him say those things. You have shed a new light on the entire subject matter and even nthough this last staement was really far out he has tied it a few times with some previous posts. I am beginning to think that he really can not mean what he says but is just saying those things for some kind of effect.

 

[Rosebonsai]

Ok, so I'm not a farm... I'm just a mom who wants to build responsibility in my kids. No, I don't want them inside playing video games, I want them outside playing in dirt. After all those are supposed to be the healthiest people around! I really hope this gets shunted to the political paper shredder!
And as soon as these chicks hatched it was my son who became responsible for them.

 

[cupman]

Nobody really knows why chickened says the things he does but I can tell you it has nothing to do with Oregon. Listening to Rush every day can really distort one's perception of reality.

 

[ChickChickChicky]

Just posted by AP:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...ME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-04-26-19-44-56

Under heavy pressure from farm groups, the Obama administration said Thursday it would drop an unpopular plan to prevent children from doing hazardous work on farms owned by anyone other than their parents.
The Labor Department said it is withdrawing proposed rules that would ban children younger than 16 from using most power-driven farm equipment, including tractors. The rules also would prevent those younger than 18 from working in feed lots, grain bins and stockyards.
While labor officials said their goal was to reduce the fatality rate for child farm workers, the proposal had become a popular political target for Republicans who called it an impractical, heavy-handed regulation that ignored the reality of small farms.
"It's good the Labor Department rethought the ridiculous regulations it was going to stick on farmers and their families," said Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. "To even propose such regulations defies common sense, and shows a real lack of understanding as to how the family farm works."
The surprise move comes just two months after the Labor Department modified the rule in a bid to satisfy opponents. The agency made it clear it would exempt children who worked on farms owned or operated by their parents, even if the ownership was part of a complex partnership or corporate agreement.
That didn't appease farm groups that complained it would upset traditions in which many children work on farms owned by uncles, grandparents and other relatives to reduce costs and learn how a farm operates. The Labor Department said Thursday it was responding to thousands of comments that expressed concern about the impact of the changes on small family-owned farms.
"The Obama administration is firmly committed to promoting family farmers and respecting the rural way of life, especially the role that parents and other family members play in passing those traditions down through the generations," the agency said in a statement.
Instead, the agency said it would work with rural stakeholders, including the American Farm Bureau Federation, the National Farmers Union and 4-H to develop an educational program to reduce accidents to young workers.
Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., a grain farmer known to till his fields on weekends away from Washington, had come out strongly against the proposed rule. The Democrat continued to criticize the Obama administration rule even after it was tempered earlier this year, saying the Labor Department "clearly didn't get the whole message" from Montana's farmers and ranchers.
Tester, who is in a tough race for re-election, on Thursday praised the decision to withdraw the rule and said he would fight "any measure that threatens that heritage and our rural way of life."
The move is sure to disappoint child safety groups who said the rules represent long-overdue protections for children working for hire in farm communities. Three-quarters of working children under 16 who died of work-related injuries in 2010 were in agriculture, according to the Child Labor Coalition.
Last month, the child advocacy group criticized GOP legislation that would have stopped the Labor Department from issuing the rules.
"They will save lives and preserve the health of farm children so they can grow up to be farmers," said Reid Maki, the CLC coordinator. "The department should implement them as soon as possible."
---

ROCK ON!

 

[RHRanch]

Nobody really knows why chickened says the things he does but I can tell you it has nothing to do with Oregon. Listening to Rush every day can really distort one's perception of reality.

Unless you listen to him with a critical ear and not take it at face value. I listen to Rush, I like to keep in touch with what is going on with him and his audience.

 

[hemet dennis]

Just posted by AP:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...ME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-04-26-19-44-56

Under heavy pressure from farm groups, the Obama administration said Thursday it would drop an unpopular plan to prevent children from doing hazardous work on farms owned by anyone other than their parents.
The Labor Department said it is withdrawing proposed rules that would ban children younger than 16 from using most power-driven farm equipment, including tractors. The rules also would prevent those younger than 18 from working in feed lots, grain bins and stockyards.
While labor officials said their goal was to reduce the fatality rate for child farm workers, the proposal had become a popular political target for Republicans who called it an impractical, heavy-handed regulation that ignored the reality of small farms.
"It's good the Labor Department rethought the ridiculous regulations it was going to stick on farmers and their families," said Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. "To even propose such regulations defies common sense, and shows a real lack of understanding as to how the family farm works."
The surprise move comes just two months after the Labor Department modified the rule in a bid to satisfy opponents. The agency made it clear it would exempt children who worked on farms owned or operated by their parents, even if the ownership was part of a complex partnership or corporate agreement.
That didn't appease farm groups that complained it would upset traditions in which many children work on farms owned by uncles, grandparents and other relatives to reduce costs and learn how a farm operates. The Labor Department said Thursday it was responding to thousands of comments that expressed concern about the impact of the changes on small family-owned farms.
"The Obama administration is firmly committed to promoting family farmers and respecting the rural way of life, especially the role that parents and other family members play in passing those traditions down through the generations," the agency said in a statement.
Instead, the agency said it would work with rural stakeholders, including the American Farm Bureau Federation, the National Farmers Union and 4-H to develop an educational program to reduce accidents to young workers.
Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., a grain farmer known to till his fields on weekends away from Washington, had come out strongly against the proposed rule. The Democrat continued to criticize the Obama administration rule even after it was tempered earlier this year, saying the Labor Department "clearly didn't get the whole message" from Montana's farmers and ranchers.
Tester, who is in a tough race for re-election, on Thursday praised the decision to withdraw the rule and said he would fight "any measure that threatens that heritage and our rural way of life."
The move is sure to disappoint child safety groups who said the rules represent long-overdue protections for children working for hire in farm communities. Three-quarters of working children under 16 who died of work-related injuries in 2010 were in agriculture, according to the Child Labor Coalition.
Last month, the child advocacy group criticized GOP legislation that would have stopped the Labor Department from issuing the rules.
"They will save lives and preserve the health of farm children so they can grow up to be farmers," said Reid Maki, the CLC coordinator. "The department should implement them as soon as possible."
---

ROCK ON!

So would this be a flip flop by Obama ?

 

[cupman]

Yeah, let's get angry and call him a flip flopper because he reversed a policy none of us wanted in the first place.

 

[hemet dennis]

Yeah, let's get angry and call him a flip flopper because he reversed a policy none of us wanted in the first place.

Why are you going to get angry ?