I've been following this thread for a while and thought I'd mention that recently there was a ruling in CA (can't remember where off the top of my head) ....I can find the article and paste it here, that some judge passed a ruling that farmers that own milk cows and sell raw milk (even tho its legal) in fact do not have a right to the milk that comes from their own cows even for private use and things have gone so far as people showing up at customer's doors demanding they confiscate the milk or even that people have to provide names of people that buy from them. Things are getting scary fast, but the absurdity particularly aimed at any ability to live sustainably is frightening.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/udder-nonsense-raw-milk-confiscations-begin/
It's been illegal to sell raw milk in Calif. for years. Just like you cant sell processed chickens for people to eat without getting them inspected.
And when they put statements like this
The FDA said there have been reports of illnesses from raw milk, but a report from the Weston A. Price Foundation revealed that from 1980 to 2005 there were 10 times more illnesses from pasteurized milk than from raw milk.
That are so misleading. They didn't mention that there's 100,000 times more pasteurized milk consumed but only 10 times more illnesses. So what one is safer ?
