- May 26, 2009
- 562
- 122
- 161
Quote:
Well, my way is "legal" too, actually. Unfortunately, many municipal governments/government entities pass unlawful ordinances/rules. I'm not real big on teaching to kids to ask permission to do things they actually have a 'right' to do. Such a mindset creates "Good little socialists"
There is a HUGE difference difference between advocating trying to "get away with" breaking the law, and standing openly in defiance of an unconstitutional/oppressive mandate. This countries founding fathers understood this concept perfectly.
Wonderful post! I daresay the majority of modern Americans don't understand the difference you speak of. As to whether something is legal or not......define "legal". The Third Reich was "legal", and they had the papers and the jackboots to prove it. Years ago, when someone wanted chickens, they got chickens. If the neighbor didn't like it, they spoke up. If they felt strongly enough about it, they fought in the yard or whatever. But it amounted to more than being a busybody yapping on the phone to the local yuppies about the neighbor's chickens. "Yes, I'd like to call and tell on my neighbor. He has chickens." "Is that so? Here's a quarter...call someone who cares." How would that work for the modern tattler? That, and everyone in the neighborhood laughing him/her to scorn.....
Well, my way is "legal" too, actually. Unfortunately, many municipal governments/government entities pass unlawful ordinances/rules. I'm not real big on teaching to kids to ask permission to do things they actually have a 'right' to do. Such a mindset creates "Good little socialists"
There is a HUGE difference difference between advocating trying to "get away with" breaking the law, and standing openly in defiance of an unconstitutional/oppressive mandate. This countries founding fathers understood this concept perfectly.
Wonderful post! I daresay the majority of modern Americans don't understand the difference you speak of. As to whether something is legal or not......define "legal". The Third Reich was "legal", and they had the papers and the jackboots to prove it. Years ago, when someone wanted chickens, they got chickens. If the neighbor didn't like it, they spoke up. If they felt strongly enough about it, they fought in the yard or whatever. But it amounted to more than being a busybody yapping on the phone to the local yuppies about the neighbor's chickens. "Yes, I'd like to call and tell on my neighbor. He has chickens." "Is that so? Here's a quarter...call someone who cares." How would that work for the modern tattler? That, and everyone in the neighborhood laughing him/her to scorn.....
Last edited: