Fawnpuppet
Chirping
- Nov 21, 2021
- 39
- 277
- 99
Is someone who was/is severely abused (or, may I add with respect, those who are considered mentally handicapped/disabled) not considered a person? They may act and behave differently and never live a "normal" life, but does that make them considered any less of a person?So, here's a question for people to think about.
Was Mr Young right and battery hens are not proper chickens?
If he was right, given their breeding, the fact they are hatched in their millions in incubators, have never aquired the skills and knowledge that broody reared, free range chickens do, are never likely to reproduce naturally.
Could they ever learn how to be proper chickens, particulalry given they have such short life spans in which to learn given the opportunity?
Of course, this question assumes anthropomorphic thinking.
As for me, I believe they are true chickens, even if they were put into an environment that was not conducive to learning what we consider proper chicken behaviors. At their core, they are chickens.
Could they learn true chicken behaviors? I don't believe they all have the ability to fully overcome what they learned. You are always going to see some of those traits. Some will be better than others and "recover" better, but on average, I don't personally believe they can learn a whole new set of skills. Why? I couldn't tell you. Genetics? Because they are animals and not "sophisticated" humans? Some other reason? A combination of all the above? I'm not sure.
Last edited: