So, do we think Mauss got it wrong? Or that the shiny hand of commercialism has killed the true idea of the gift? Or is something else at work with all of us saying thanks but no thanks to presents from nearest and dearest?
Glad to read that the social side was great anyway! Same here.
So, for future reference, would the idea of each person bringing something to the feast work better? Their present to all being whatever meal component they provided? A trad Christmas dinner is astonishingly expensive to put on, especially given the number of diners is usually significantly larger than the host typically plans, buys and cooks for. So each person shares the workload and the provisions budget with the others round the table, instead of spending time and money on finding, wrapping and giving additional and unwanted stuff before or after? And then the host just has to co-ordinate, instead of provide everything, while all the social bonds or whatever else it is that traditional gift-giving is supposed to affirm (and which explains how upset some people get when you don't want anything) get affirmed. (Might not work with picky eaters.)
Have they not been along for a while? Or is it ongoing? Has nothing worked to stop that rat?